On Sunday, December 10, 2017 at 11:41:21 PM UTC, John Clark wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:42 PM, <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> wrote:
>
> ​> ​
>> What is the connection between the Equivalence Principle and Einstein's 
>> Field Equations? How did the former lead to the latter? Why was the man 
>> falling from the ladder so decisive in leading to the Theory of General 
>> Relativity? 
>>
>
>
> The Equivalence Principle says if 
> ​you
>  ignore tidal effects and you're in a windowless elevator cab there is no 
> way to know if you're sitting on the Earth in a gravitational field or in 
> deep intergalactic space being accelerated by a rocket upward at 1G. If you 
> feel zero G and fire a Laser pointer from one wall 
> ​to the other ​
> it will go in a straight line and hit the exact opposite side on the other 
> wall. But if you were being accelerated upward the elevator cab will move 
> ​slightly ​
> upward in the time it takes for the light to go from one wall to the other 
> so the spot the laser makes on the other wall will be slightly lower than 
> it was when you were in zero G, you see the laser beam follow a curve.
>
> A curved line from one wall to the other is longer than a straight line
> ​,​
> and yet when you measure the time it takes for light to do this with your 
> very accurate clock you notice its exactly the same. You already know the 
> measured speed of light never changes so 
> ​if something is moving at the same speed and moves a greater distance in 
> the same number of clock ticks then 
> you'd have to conclude that being accelerated makes your clock run slow. 
> And because of the Equivalence Principle you'd have to 
> ​also ​
> conclude that a gravitational field bends light and makes time run slow 
> ​just as acceleration does.​
>
> ​John K Clark​
>
>
Excellent summary. TY. But why would Einstein think there could be a 
covariant theory for accelerating frames when an observer inside such a 
frame can do measurements to confirm acceleration and differences with 
other such frames, unlike the case for inertial frames which are clearly 
equivalent? AG 

>
>
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to