On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 8:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The actual clock readings depends on the number of ticks. So if you claim > the number of ticks is the same for both clocks, there will no difference > in their readings. *Both clocks produced the same number of ticks in the time it takes the laser to go from one wall to the other, but in one case (the curved case) light went a longer distance than the other case, you know that light can't change its speed so you have to conclude that the 2 clocks can't be running at the same rate.* > > I still question why SR is relevant *If the 2 clocks were stationary relative to each other then it wouldn't be, but they aren't so it is. * *John K Clark * > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
