On 12/13/2017 5:24 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:


On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 10:44:14 PM UTC, Brent wrote:



    On 12/13/2017 2:20 PM, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:


    On Wednesday, December 13, 2017 at 9:15:36 PM UTC, Brent wrote:



        On 12/13/2017 2:45 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
        *BUT for a nucleus of a radioactive element, the nucleus is
        never Decayed and Undecayed SIMULTANEOUSLY.*
        Sure it is.  It's in a coherent superposition of those states
        until it interacts with the environment.

        Brent

    *
    That's the conventional QM wisdom and the cause of the paradox of
    a cat Alive and Dead simultaneously. As I explained, the fallacy
    is rooted in an unjustified generalization of the double slit
    experiment where the probability waves do, in fact, exist
    simultaneously.  What waves do you claim are interacting for the
    radioactive nucleus to produce coherence? Tell me about them. I
    am from Missouri. AG*

    You seem to think that coherence requires two different waves. 
    This is the wrong way to look at it.  In Young's slits experiment
    there is only one wave, which goes through both slits and
    interferes with itself.


*That's exactly how I see it! Interference requires two waves which interact with each other.
*

/*NO.  This is false! */ /*There are not two waves.*/ You can write it as two parts, just as you can write a description of an ocean wave as the part on your left and the part on your right.  But so long as they are coherent, maintaining a fixed phase relation, they are one wave.

*This is exactly what we see in Young's slits experiments. AG
*

    And unstable nucleus has a probability amplitude that includes a
    "decayed" part and a "not decayed" part.  It's a tunneling problem.


*I don't doubt the existence of amplitudes. What I do doubt. and in fact deny, is interference between two waves that don't exist simultaneously. *

You keep referring to two waves. /*There are not two waves. */There's only one wave which interferes with itself.  It is typically written as |not-decayed> + |decayed>, but that's just a choice of basis.  It could as well be written |unstable nucleus>.

*If there's no interference, then the cat cannot be Alive and Dead simultaneously. Tunneling can exist, but still, no simultaneous interacting, interfering waves. Is there any advantage to believing in two waves which don't exist simultaneous, can interfere with each other? AG*

You are confused.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to