On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 8:28:18 AM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 8:54:53 AM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 7:21:40 PM UTC-7, agrays...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 2, 2018 at 6:36:56 PM UTC-7, Zachary Smith wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 8:12:51 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sunday, December 31, 2017 at 6:38:55 PM UTC-7, Russell Standish >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 05:07:54PM -0800, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> > If 15 minutes exceeds your attention span, maybe you should retire >>>>>> from >>>>>> > your quest for knowledge. AG >>>>>> >>>>>> 15 minutes of undirected "there is something in this 15 minutes of >>>>>> video that I *think* will change your mind about..." is not >>>>>> exactly encouraging enough for me to spend 15 minutes watching a >>>>>> video, the >>>>>> contents of which I've mostly seen before. If there was something >>>>>> new, >>>>>> I'd probably miss it anyway in the boredom of it all. >>>>>> >>>>>> I _will_ spend 15 minutes thinking about something if you convince me >>>>>> in >>>>>> the first 30 seconds that there is some likelihood I'll learn >>>>>> something new in the process. That means abstracting out the core >>>>>> details in the covering email, and supplying a time code of the >>>>>> pertinent bits. There is a reason why most academics read >>>>>> articles abstract first, then the conclusion before reading the >>>>>> remainder. >>>>>> >>>>>> You have to convince someone it is worth their while. Youtube videos >>>>>> are mostly a waste of time in my experience. >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Once you admit that the witnesses are credible, your view of >>>>> visitation issue will >>>>> radically change. AG >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> **EYEWITNESS EVIDENCE IS THE LEAST SCIENTIFIC/CREDIBLE EVIDENCE THERE >>>> IS. >>>> >>> >>> Brilliant. Incredibly brilliant. Thank you. AG >>> >> >> *What you fail to grasp is that eyewitness testimony can be absolutely >> accurate or completely worthless, depending on the circumstance or context. >> Those who unthinkingly endorse your pov are just showing their foolish >> bias, in effect asserting that aliens haven't visited because of their >> reliance on ignorance. That a secret black budget existed at least until >> 2012 to further investigate this issue, shows that the Pentagon has taken >> it seriously. In recent public statements, the director of that program >> claims it continues. AG* >> > > That program has been revealed to be the child of Harry Reid, Senator from > Nevada. At the request of Bigelow, who is advancing the idea of big > inflated habitable modules in space, this program germinated. Bigelow is > interested in UFO stuff and wanted a program to investigate this. This > program was not started because of some serious military concern. > > LC >
I wrote the Pentagon is taking the issue seriously, which doesn't mean it's considered a national security threat. Anyway, we can't be subject to visitations since your calculations are dispositive. AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
