https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/speaking-of-science/wp/2017/11/28/scientists-dna-tested-nine-yeti-samples-they-didnt-find-bigfoot/?utm_term=.a71965511594

The connection between yeti and bear is an old one. Messner and Hillary 
eventually concluded what they had seen were bears. Biologists have made 
the link, too. In 2013, Oxford University issued a worldwide call for yeti 
samples. Oxford geneticist Bryan Sykes said that DNA from hairs revealed 
the yeti was similar to an ancient, extinct polar bear. For a moment, 
this biological curiosity revived hopes that an undiscovered animal loped 
through Tibetan snow.

“I think this bear, which nobody has seen alive . . . may still be there 
and may have quite a lot of polar bear in it,” Skyes told 
<http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-24564487> the BBC in 2013.

But other genetics experts, notably Ross Barnett 
<http://ku-dk.academia.edu/RossBarnett> at the University of Copenhagen, 
contested that finding. Sykes had made an error, partly due to degraded 
DNA, according to a re-analysis 
<http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/282/1800/20141712> of the 
research by Barnett and University of Huddersfield biomolecular 
archaeologist Ceiridwen Edwards 
<https://research.hud.ac.uk/ourstaff/profile/index.php?staffid=1413>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to