On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 3:21 AM, Russell Standish <li...@hpcoders.com.au> wrote:
> >> >> C++ is Turing complete but is not a Turing machine because machines are >> physical objects made of atoms but C++ is not nor is any language. > > > *> Nor is a Turing machine for that matter.* This Turing machine certainly seems to be made of matter, atoms in particular : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3keLeMwfHY > ** > *I suspect he does know how to write a "Loebian machine" in Lisp or > Prolog* If so then a "Loebian machine" is just a type of Turing Machine and Bruno has not discovered anything fundamental that Turing didn't know about 82 years ago . John K Clark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
