On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 9:07:37 PM UTC, smitra wrote:
>
> On 21-04-2018 21:44, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote: 
> > On Saturday, April 21, 2018 at 3:12:48 PM UTC-4, smitra wrote: 
> > 
> >> On 20-04-2018 02:44, Brent Meeker wrote: 
> >>> On 4/19/2018 5:29 PM, smitra wrote: 
> >>>> One can a priori rule out any non-local effects using the fact 
> >> that 
> >>>> the dynamics as described by the Schrödinger equation is local. 
> >> So, in 
> >>>> any theory where there is no collapse and everything follows from 
> >> only 
> >>>> the Schrödinger equation, there cannot be non-local effects 
> >>> 
> >>> The wave-function exists in configuration space so a point in it 
> >>> already refers to multiple points in 3space. 
> >>> 
> >>> Brent 
> >> 
> >> Yes, but that doesn't yield any non-local effects. 
> >> 
> >> Saibal 
> > 
> > Why would you think it would, or should? Even the wf for the singlet 
> > system doesn't do that on its face. It's the Bell statistics that 
> > establish non locality. AG 
>
>
> What the Bell statistics prove is that any hidden variable theory that 
> would explain why in an experiment we obtain one result rather than one 
> of the other possible results, would necessarily have to be a non-local 
> theory. 


But wouldn't a non local theory also have the detraction of implying
instantaneous action at a distance?  AG

This means that if we reject non-local theories, we have to 
> reject any hidden variable theory. 
>
> While one considers the special case of entangled particles to get this 
> result, the conclusion is, of course, valid in general: If there were a 
> hidden variable theory underlying QM, it would have to fully reproduce 
> QM and one can then show using the special case of entangled particles 
> that the actual dynamics of the hidden variable theory must be 
> non-local. 
>
> But as long as we stay away from any hypothetical hidden variable theory 
> (there isn't a shred of evidence for such theories) any non-locality 
> associated with such theories is totally irrelevant. 
>
> Saibal 
>
>
> >  -- 
> >  You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> > Groups "Everything List" group. 
> >  To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, 
> > send an email to [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> >  To post to this group, send email to 
> > [email protected] <javascript:>. 
> >  Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> > [1]. 
> >  For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout [2]. 
> > 
> > 
> > Links: 
> > ------ 
> > [1] https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> > [2] https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to