On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On 6/19/2018 8:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> Most of these objections to CI are answered by decoherence theory. >>> >> >> I have no clue how to interpret decoherence with a collapse theory. >> > > You use decoherence theory until you get to the reduced density matrix > that is diagonal FAPP (or for all conscious purposes) and then you declare > it is exactly diagonal and cut the other "worlds" loose. What's the point of that last step, when decoherence explains why we don't see those other branches? Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
