> On 30 Sep 2018, at 11:53, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 9:35:18 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
>> On 29 Sep 2018, at 13:16, [email protected] <javascript:> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 10:41:42 AM UTC, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Saturday, September 29, 2018 at 4:48:44 AM UTC-5, [email protected] <> 
>> wrote:
>>  It claims that all mathematical objects exist in "physical" reality, which 
>> is sort-of isomorphic or in some sense identical to these objects. That is, 
>> no dichotomy between "physical" and mathematical objects, and all the latter 
>> including plane waves exist in this reality. But you will never observe a 
>> plane wave, so the MUH is falsified. AG 
>> 
>> 1. Tegmark claims everything in the universe is mathematical - that is, the 
>> universe consists of mathematical objects.
>> 2. Tegmark also says that infinities should be eliminated from physics - in 
>> fact, infinities are ruining physics.
>> [ 
>> http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/02/20/infinity-ruining-physics/ 
>> <http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2015/02/20/infinity-ruining-physics/>
>>  ]ac
>> 
>> Bruno wrote 1 & 2.  AG
>> 
>> So then via Tegmark there can be no real continuous (infinitely divisible) 
>> objects like (mathematical) waves, putting 1 and 2 together. Only particular 
>> mathematical objects exist.
>> 
>> According to Wiki, and what I've heard from its adherents, the MUH posits 
>> that ALL mathematical object or entities exist in nature. But plane waves do 
>> not exist in nature.
> 
> There is no nature that you can invoke. Once mechanism is assumed, a term 
> like nature needs to be (re-defined, or explained, without physicalist 
> assumption, implicit or explicit.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> (Do you know what they are?) So the MUH as claimed by Wiki and its adherents 
>> is falsified. AG 
> 
> I agree with your conclusion, but you assume some nature or matter, which 
> cannot work in the mechanist context.
> 
> I didn't assume anything, except that plane waves will never be observed 
> (regardless of your model of external reality)

That is a too general statement. I can agree with some definition of 
observation. But then we never observe anything mathematical, still less 
infinite.

Anyway, you seem to use “observation” as a criteria of reality. Then I just did 
an observation of a plane wave, in my waking dream ...




> unless you agree to instantaneous action at a distance, and on steroids (!), 
> since as time evolves, the amplitude of a plane wave changes instantaneously 
> in all infinite directions. So I am just asserting that Tegmark's MUH has 
> been falsified since plane waves mathematically exist,

In which theory. With mechanism what exist is only the numbers (or only the 
combinators, …).



> but are never reified by whatever is out there -- matter, or nothing but 
> restrictions on motion giving rise the illusion of matter or something solid 
> existing.

OK. That is where we will be led, in the computationalist frame.



> Incidentally, I don't think the Wiki article refutes Tegmark as you claim; 
> rather it just describes it.


Read more carefully. I have refuted Tegmark in this list. Then I say that that 
wiki entry is very bad. Those are independent statements.

Bruno



> AG
> 
> Bruno
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>>  - pt
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected] <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
>> <javascript:>.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
>> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to