On 10/7/2018 11:50 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
What isn't clear yet to me is how experience (that which one
experiences in a phenomenal sense) comes out of pure information.
(They can be simulated, but not realized.) If experientiality itself a
property of the "hardware" (matter) and physics is just "software",
then it makes more sense.
That seems impossibly vague. Why is this property of experientiality
associated with the physical processes of perception and not other
physical processes? Why is a associated with processes at all? If it's
a property of matter then it's like weight. It doesn't need a process
to be realized?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
