On Tuesday, October 30, 2018 at 8:58:30 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 29 Oct 2018, at 13:55, agrays...@gmail.com <javascript:> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, October 29, 2018 at 10:22:02 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 28 Oct 2018, at 13:21, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sunday, October 28, 2018 at 9:27:56 AM UTC, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25 Oct 2018, at 17:12, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, October 23, 2018 at 10:39:11 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If a system is in a superposition of states, whatever value measured, 
>>>> will be repeated if the same system is repeatedly measured.  But what 
>>>> happens if the system is in a mixed state? TIA, AG
>>>>
>>>
>>> If you think about it, whatever value you get on a single trial for a 
>>> mixed state, repeated on the same system, will result in the same value 
>>> measured repeatedly. If this is true, how does measurement distinguish 
>>> superposition of states, with mixed states? AG
>>>
>>>
>>> That is not correct. You can distinguish a mixture of particles in the 
>>> up or down states with a set of 1/sqrt(2)(up+down) by measuring them with 
>>> the {1/sqrt(2)(up+down), 1/sqrt(2)(up-down}) discriminating apparatus. With 
>>> the mixture, half the particles will be defected in one direction, with the 
>>> pure state, they will all pass in the same direction. Superposition would 
>>> not have been discovered if that was not the case.
>>>
>>
>>
>> *And someone will supply the apparatus measuring (up + down), and (up - 
>> down)? No such apparatuses are possible since those states are inherently 
>> contradictory. We can only measure up / down. AG*
>>
>>
>> You can do the experience by yourself using a simple crystal of calcium 
>> (CaCO3, Island Spath), or with polarising glass. Or with Stern-Gerlach 
>> devices and electron spin. Just rotating (90° or 180°) an app/down 
>> apparatus, gives you an (up + down)/(up - down) apparatus. 
>>
>
> *I don't understand. With SG one can change the up/down axis by rotation, 
> but that doesn't result in an (up + down), or (up - down) measurement. If 
> that were the case, what is the operator for which those states are 
> eigenstates? Which book by Albert? AG *
>
>
> David Z Albert, Quantum Mechanics and Experience, Harvard University 
> Press, 1992.
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Quantum-Mechanics-Experience-David-Albert/dp/0674741137
>
> Another very good books is
>
> D’Espagnat B. Conceptual foundations of Quantum mechanics,  I see there is 
> a new edition here:
>
> https://www.amazon.com/Conceptual-Foundations-Quantum-Mechanics-Advanced/dp/0738201049/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1540889778&sr=1-1&keywords=d%27espagnat+conceptual+foundation+of+quantum+mechanics&dpID=41NcluHD6fL&preST=_SY291_BO1,204,203,200_QL40_&dpSrc=srch
>
> It explains very well the difference between mixtures and pure states.
>
> Bruno
>

*Thanks for the references. I think I have a reasonable decent 
understanding of mixed states. Say a system is in a mixed state of phi1 and 
phi2 with some probability for each. IIUC, a measurement will always result 
in an eigenstate of either phi1 or phi2 (with relative probabilities 
applying). So if we're measuring spin, the result will always be an 
eigenstate of the spin vector for phi1 or phi2. But (up + down) and (up - 
down) are NOT eigenstates of either. How then can you justify your claim of 
measuring (up + down) or (up - down)? AG  *

>
> Buy the book by David Albert. It will help you a lot, I think.
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bruno
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "Everything List" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
>>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com.
>> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com.
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-li...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To post to this group, send email to everyth...@googlegroups.com 
> <javascript:>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to