On 12/23/2018 4:04 AM, Jason Resch wrote:


On Sunday, December 23, 2018, Brent Meeker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 12/22/2018 4:29 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


    On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 10:01 PM Brent Meeker
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



        On 12/21/2018 5:43 PM, Jason Resch wrote:


        On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 12:46 PM Brent Meeker
        <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



            On 12/20/2018 9:09 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
            > I am not advocating any global reference frame, just
            mentioning that
            > for a particular observe, they can define a present
            that works for
            > them (in their own reference frame). From their point
            of view they can
            > consider themselves at rest (whether they are or are
            not).

            They can define it in words, but can they define it
            physically.


        What is wrong with using the 3-d hyperspace perpendicular to
        their direction through spacetime?

        That's words.  How shall they determine whether event X in
        distant galaxy Y is simultaneous with their clock reading Z? 
        Is their "direction through spacetime" constant over billions
        of years?


    If the event occurred N-light years away, and light from that
    event arrives in N-years, then it can be considered simultaneous
    with the observer.

    You mean it could have been considered simultaneous if the
    observer had known it at the time and the observer had not changed
    motion in the intervening years.


    If their direction through spacetime changes, they must change
    their interpretation of what constitutes the present.

    So as I get up and walk to the garage, whole galaxies of events
    switch from my past to my future. What is the physical
    significance of this?


    Brent



Nothing, beyond showing we exist in a 4d spacetime with no objective present (a block time).

That's what I thought you wanted to conclude.  But it doesn't follow.  The specious present is just a mathematical construct and has no physical significance.  It says no more than that one can make a 4D map.

Brent

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to