On Tuesday, March 19, 2019 at 7:23:29 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: > > > > On 3/19/2019 9:32 AM, John Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 4:50 AM <[email protected] <javascript:>> wrote: > > * > I suppose Einstein started with the motivation of finding a general >> transformation from one accelerating frame to another, and later gave up on >> this project and settled for a theory of gravity. Is this true? TIA, AG* > > > Einstein's breakthrough, what he called "the happiest thought of my life" > was when he realized a man in a falling elevator will not feel gravity but > a man in a accelerating elevator will. In other words an accelerating frame > and gravity are the same thing, that's why it's called the Equivalence > Principle. > > > I wonder if Einstein ever considered whether a charged particle in the > falling radiate would radiate? > > Brent >
Because of your typos, at first I thought you were joking. Well, maybe it was a joke, but for me it sounds like a damned good question. I surmise that a charged particle accelerating due to gravity does NOT radiate energy, but why? AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
