You cannot invalidate the fact that consciousness is all there is, because for any fact X that you assume that you discover, that X is a thought in consciousness.
Evolution is the evolution of consciousness - I don't see where I borrow anything from materialist ideas. Evolution is deducible directly from looking at qualia. There are no "bodies" that evolve, but consciousnesses that evolve. Brain scans is scans about systems of interacting consciousnesses - I don't see where I borrow anything from materialist ideas. Otherwise, when you say "my ideas", what exactly are you referring to ? Is not clear to me what you consider my ideas to be. It seems to me that you don't even pay any attention to what I am saying. I don't know what you expect from me. Probably to give you all the answers in the universe. Well... this nobody is able to do. But if you would really pay attention to my ideas, you would see for example that my ideas are able to explain the passage of time, a thing that nobody done before, and in principle is a Nobel prize worth explanation. On Sunday, 28 April 2019 23:10:31 UTC+3, Terren Suydam wrote: > > That is, what fact could you discover that would invalidate your ideas? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
