Landing on the Moon is anecdotal, since is only reported by 3 people. Telepathies are reported by 7 billion people all the time, including me, so they are not anecdotal. They are like breathing. Everybody breaths. And if you say you never had telepathies, you lie.
On Friday, 17 May 2019 20:13:35 UTC+3, howardmarks wrote: > > Just because an article in a journal of APS, AAAS (both organizations of > which I am a member), or Nature appears, doesn't mean the subject matter of > the article is true. I had an EE educated father with a dozen patents that > "believed" in psychic phenomena, and helping him investigate was very > sobering, as all leads ended in a brick wall - when it came to actually > performing. That's how I met Randi. So much anecdotal "evidence." But the > bottom line was, all anecdotes, when one does due diligence to see the > performance - can't demonstrate, without exception. And, Cosmin, if you > would actually investigate, rather than decide how "believable" anecdotal > stories are - you might change your "beliefs!" > Cheers! Howard Marks > > On 5/17/2019 10:00 AM, John Clark wrote: > > On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 8:42 AM 'Cosmin Visan' < > everyth...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > *> Also in cases of telepathy and precognitions the "technology" and the >> "motivation" existed at the moment of their occurrence. Actually, it seems >> that the conditions required for paranormal phenomena are being met way >> more often that the conditions required for Moon landing.* >> > > If you're right about that then it should be easy to find > ironclad evidence within the month that will convince even the most > skeptical editors of journals like Physical Review Letters, Nature or > Science that telepathy and precognition actually exist. So let's make a > bet and I'll give you 10 to one odds; if a pro ESP article appears before > June 17 2019 in any of those journals I'll give you $10,000, if it doesn't > you only have to give me $100. And remember the article doesn't need to > explain why the phenomena exists it just has to show that something exists > that needs explaining, So do we have a bet? > > John K Clark > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to everyth...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv01SmhNhzFt8QfhC-vZdzRc6nayOh%2Bm91yo2NcmUX6Pig%40mail.gmail.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv01SmhNhzFt8QfhC-vZdzRc6nayOh%2Bm91yo2NcmUX6Pig%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/106b04eb-c269-4765-b551-2c1269366021%40googlegroups.com.
