On Friday, September 20, 2019 at 6:31:15 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 17 Sep 2019, at 16:04, Philip Thrift <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > From a pragmatic perspective, I do not see any Everettian MW (theory, > math, ideas, formulations, interpretations or whatever they want to call > it) in computational quantum mechanics: > > > https://www.simonsfoundation.org/flatiron/center-for-computational-quantum-physics/software > > If MW were important, it would be there. > > > > All computational theory (quantum or not) implies the "Many Computations”. > > Bruno > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/cde4e698-1c19-4ad2-b6cb-c1aa343fdec9%40googlegroups.com.
