On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 3:12 AM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 9/30/2019 11:06 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > You say the light carrying the >> information isn't coherent, but it's not just the light that carries the >> information; it's information encoded in the wave function of the >> environment. > > > That information encoded in the wave function of the environment has to be > coherent if the impossible branches are to cancel out. And that coherence > must originate in the measurement interactions that Alice and Bob perform. > And that is non-local, since Bob and Alice are space like separated. > > > You're right. > You're conceding? I expected more of an argument..... You couldn't scan the relevant section of Carroll's book and send it to me, could you? Please. I would like to see how Carroll attempts to get out of the non-locality issue..... Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQb076CzUR34yhvcXWW0NyjLR0bcagvSjAi-%2B8JKy2eLA%40mail.gmail.com.
