There is no way for the Many Worldists to squirrel out of it. Run the code
*Getting started with Qiskit: while exploring the quantum world, let’s play the coin flip game!* https://medium.com/@esobimpe/getting-started-with-qiskit-while-exploring-the-quantum-world-lets-play-the-coin-flip-game-2319bb293c6a with a loop of 100. if MWI is true there will be 2^100 worlds. In each world there is a Sean Carroll looking at a different result. @philipthrift On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 2:07:28 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: > > > > On 10/3/2019 10:44 AM, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Thursday, October 3, 2019 at 12:39:09 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 10/3/2019 6:29 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> > Why would the energy of a branch be related to its probability of >> > occurrance? One can imagine a very low probability, so low that it >> > can't even contain copies of the experimenter. Totally ridiculous! AG >> >> It it's probability were zero would you still count its energy? >> >> Brent >> > > > > But MWI eliminates probabilities. > > > That's its problem. But it has to explain the appearance of > probabilities. > > > World W branches into W0 and W1, then W00, W01, W10, W11, then ... > > They all exist in MWI. > > > But WA, WB, WC,... don't. it's a popular fallacy that MWI means everything > happens. > > Brent > > > Given a world (in Sabine's MWI above) W where there is a computer C with a > quantum random number generator, after C generates a string of 1000 0s and > 1s, the energy of the computer > > C-[one thousand (0|1)s] > > in each leaf world of the resulting branching tree will be 1/(2^1000)th > of energy of C. > > @philipthrift > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/46ef9060-c1d7-4760-9ed5-48cb37dc83dc%40googlegroups.com.
