On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 11:35:58 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 3:50:46 PM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote
>>
>>
>> On Monday, October 14, 2019 at 10:51:03 AM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/13/2019 9:10 PM, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 5:50:35 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 10/13/2019 1:08 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: 
>>>> > What are YOU talking about? I just made a GUESS about the decoherence 
>>>> > time! Whatever it is, it doesn't change my conclusion. If there's a 
>>>> > uncertainty in time, are you claiming the cat can be alive and dead 
>>>> > during any duration?  Is this what decoherence theory offers? AG 
>>>>
>>>> Yes, part of the cat can be alive and part dead over a period seconds.  
>>>> Or looked at another way, there is a transistion period in which the 
>>>> cat 
>>>> is both alive and dead. 
>>>>
>>>> But the main point is that this time had nothing to do with 
>>>> Schroedinger's argument (he knew perfectly well the time of death was 
>>>> vague); his argument was that Bohr's interpretation implied that the 
>>>> cat 
>>>> was in a super-position of alive and dead from the time the box was 
>>>> closed until someone looked in. 
>>>>
>>>> Brent 
>>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed. Without decoherence, the cat would be in a superposition of
>>> alive and dead from the time the box was closed until someone opened
>>> it. With decoherence, it would be in that superposition for a very short
>>> time, the decoherence time, when it would be in state, |decayed>|dead>
>>> or |undecayed> |alive> before the box was opened, provided it was
>>> opened after the decoherence time. So, as I see it, decoherence just
>>> moves the "collapse" earlier, before the box is opened, and does not
>>> resolve S's problem with superposition. 
>>>
>>>
>>> True, but it resolves the problem about whether conscious observers are 
>>> necessary to "collapse" the wave function (or split the world). 
>>>
>>
>> I think Feynman answer this question before the advent of decoherence 
>> theory. I recall reading his comments that an instrument was sufficient for 
>> observing a double slit experiment, and even destroying the interference if 
>> rigged to determine which-way. AG 
>>
>> The idea of decoherence is that, it not carefully isolated, systems are 
>>> continuously "monitored" by the environment and so act classically.
>>>
>>> Here's a good analysis which casts the Schroedinger cat story into a 
>>> double slit-experiment.
>>>
>>> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.7612.pdf
>>>
>>> The cause of the problem, or
>>> paradox if you will, is the superposition interpretation of the 
>>> radioactive
>>> source. AG  
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, that's the problem.  The radioactive nucleus is effectively 
>>> isolated until it decays, after which it is not isolated...it has 
>>> interacted with the detector.  So in the MWI the system is splitting 
>>> continuously into the branch were the atom hasn't decayed and the branch 
>>> where is has just decayed and interacted with the environment.  The atom is 
>>> in a superposition of decayed and not decayed with amplitudes varying in 
>>> time:   psi = sqrt[exp(-at)]|not decayed> +sqrt[1-expt(-at)]|decayed>  .
>>>
>>
>> But isn't this superposition, interpreted to mean the source is in both 
>> states simultaneously before measurement, responsible for the paradox of a 
>> cat which is alive and dead simultaneously, even if for a very short time 
>> if decoherence is considered? If so, isn't this sufficient to question the 
>> validity of said interpretation? AG 
>>
>
> Sean says the decoherence time is 10^(-20) sec. So when the box is closed, 
> the cat is in a superposition of alive and dead during that time interval, 
> assuming the decay hasn't happened. If that's the case, I don't see how 
> decoherence solves the paradox, unless we can assume an initial condition 
> where the probability of one component of the superposition, that the cat 
> is dead, is zero. Maybe this is the solution. What do you think? AG
>

Maybe this is an easier question; after decoherence, assuming the 
radioactive source hasn't decayed, what is the wf of the cat?  Is the cat 
in a mixed state, alive or dead with some probabIlity for each? AG

>
>>> Brent
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2a9e57dc-8480-43cf-83f4-3e1ff8998806%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to