On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 6:33:05 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/7/2020 4:54 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 11:25 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected] 
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> On Friday, March 6, 2020 at 1:22:30 PM UTC-7, Philip Thrift wrote: 
>>>
>>>
>>> Sean Carroll
>>> @seanmcarroll
>>> ·
>>> What really happens to Schrödinger’s cat is that it becomes entangled 
>>> with its environment, so that the wave function comes to describe multiple 
>>> almost-classical worlds! Happens to all of us, and nicely explained in this 
>>> @veritasium video.
>>>
>>> https://twitter.com/seanmcarroll/status/1235999175428333568
>>>
>>> @philipthrift
>>>
>>
>> I've  asked this before and might have gotten some replies, but I can't 
>> recall what they were. Many of the quantum paradoxes arise due to a 
>> particular interpretation of superposition, namely, that all alternatives 
>> happen simultaneously (before measurement). Why can't superposition be 
>> interpreted to mean that each alternative has a probability of occurrence 
>> and nothing more? TIA, AG 
>>
>
> In a collapse or an epistemic interpretation, that is exactly what it 
> means.
>
>
> The problem is saying exactly when the Schroedinger equation stops 
> describing the evolution and the alternative happens, i.e. the wf 
> collapses.  In QBism it's when you learn the result and you update your 
> knowledge.  In the Transactional interpretation it's when an interaction is 
> realized.  I think Zurek's quantum Darwinism could be given this 
> interpretation: when the cross terms in the pointer basis become 
> sufficiently small.
>
> Brent
>

I think the Transactional Interpretation has additional problems, such as 
forward (or backward?) in time signaling. Does a comparable problem arise 
when using Heisenberg's formulation of QM? AG 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/966b7008-64b1-42f4-ac9c-1cb21c880f97%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to