On Sunday, March 8, 2020 at 5:32:15 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Saturday, March 7, 2020 at 10:39:09 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/7/2020 8:17 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 3:10 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 3/7/2020 7:38 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> I think the Transactional Interpretation has additional problems, such >>> as forward (or backward?) in time signaling. >>> >>> >>> Ruth Kastner has tried to fix that by postulating a possibility space >>> where the offer wave elicits the answer wave; so it's not in spacetime. >>> >> >> >> Possibility space sounds very much like magical space, where anything you >> want to happen can happen..... >> >> >> No, it's like the wave function where possibilities are encoded with >> amplitudes. The essential idea isn't the possibility space, it's the idea >> that "events" which are interactions that transfer energy really happen. >> This takes the place of decoherence and collapse of the wave function. >> >> Brent >> > > > The nature of the probability space is that it is based on complex numbers > q from the unit circle group |q| = 1 rather real numbers p in [0,1]. > > Rather than an event weighted by a real number, an event is a set of > counterevents - each c.e. weighted by a complex number (which are then > summed and the norm is taken) to get the real number weight of the event. > > @philipthrift >
Actually there's a list of references that's been collected: http://physics.bu.edu/~youssef/quantum/quantum_refs.html @philipthrift -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/11ea5a08-f148-465d-97bd-09275697ede0%40googlegroups.com.
