On Monday, May 11, 2020 at 12:42:03 AM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 4:24 PM Alan Grayson <agrays...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> Thinking further about this, I prefer my original hypothesis above, that >> the cosmological red-shift doesn't imply real loss of energy. It's just an >> apparent effect due to relative motion, the usual Doppler shift. AG >> > > > The cosmologist Ted Bunn has a theory something like this: it involves > selecting a particular way of parallel transporting the light from the > distant galaxies to us so that the red shift can be interpreted as a > Doppler shift. I have no references, but I think he has a web site or blog > where he discusses this. It is not a popular theory. > > Bruce >
Maybe you can offer an opinion; is there anything in the data that indicates the so-called cosmological redshift is not simply Doppler shift due to recession? TIA, AG -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ee01bfdb-0ff6-44f3-b323-b71311992ded%40googlegroups.com.
