> On 12 Jun 2020, at 22:35, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/12/2020 12:56 PM, smitra wrote:
>> Yes, the way we do physics assumes QM and statistical effects are due to the 
>> rules of QM. But in a more general multiverse setting 
> 
> Why should we consider such a thing.

Because you need arithmetic to define “digital machine”, but once you have 
arithmetic you get all computations, and the working first person 
predictability have to be justified by the self-referential machine abilities.




> 
>> where we consider different laws of physics or different initial conditions, 
>> the notion of single universes with well defined laws becomes ambiguous. 
> 
> Does it?  How can there be multiples if there are not singles?

That a good point. “Many-universes” is still a simplified notion. There are 
only relative state in arithmetic. Eventually digital mechanism leads to 0 
physical universe, just a web of number’s dreams.



> 
>> Let's assume that consciousness is in general generated by algorithms which 
>> can be implemented in many different universes with different laws as well 
>> as in different locations within the same universe where the local 
>> environments are similar but not exactly the same. Then the algorithm plus 
>> its local environment 
> 
> Algorithm + environment sounds like a category error.


Algorithm + primitively physical environment is a category error. We can say 
that.

Bruno




> 
> Brent
> 
>> evolves in each universe according to the laws that apply in each universe. 
>> But because the conscious agent cannot locate itself in one or the other 
>> universe, one can now also consider time evolutions involving random jumps 
>> from one to the other universes. And so the whole notion of fixed universes 
>> with well defined laws breaks down. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/948ee692-14dc-777c-4de0-6211dc50b412%40verizon.net.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0B5177D4-2A28-4478-8396-18B01129A34C%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to