On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 2:51 AM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote:

> https://planetofthehumans.com/ <https://planetofthehumans.com/>
> Largely correct, but omits the solution; thorium reactors. Check Wiki for
> the residuals; no gamma rays. AG
>

*YES!* I've been a fan of Thorium reactors for years, in particular Liquid
Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR) and I'm very impressed, I don't believe
nearly enough is being done in this area. Consider the advantages:

*Thorium is much more common than Uranium, almost twice as common as Tin in
fact. And Thorium is easier to extract from its ore than Uranium.

*A Thorium reactor burns up all the Thorium in it so at current usage that
element could supply our energy needs for many thousands, perhaps millions
of years; A conventional light water reactor only burns .7% of the Uranium
in it.

* To burn the remaining 99.3% of Uranium you'd have to use a exotic fast
neutron breeder reactor, Thorium reactors use slow neutrons and so are
inherently more stable because you have much more time to react if
something goes wrong. Also breeders produce massive amounts of Plutonium
which is a bad thing if you're worried about people making bombs.

*Thorium reactors produce an insignificant amount of Plutonium, they do
produce Uranium-233 and theoretically you could make a bomb out of that,
but it would be contaminated with Uranium-232 which is a powerful gamma ray
emitter which would make it suicidal to work with unless extraordinary
precautions were taken, and even then the unexploded bomb would be so
radioactive it would give away its location if you tried to hide it, and
the gamma rays would destroy its electronic firing circuits, and degrade
its chemical explosives. As far as I know a U-233 bomb was attempted only
twice, in 1955 the USA set off a Plutonium/U233 composite bomb, it was
expected to produce 33 kilotons but only managed 22; the only pure U-233
bomb I know of was set off in 1998 by India, but it was a fizzle, a
complete flop, it produced a minuscule explosion of only equivalent to 200
tons of TNT due to pre-detonation. For these reasons even after 75 years no
nation currently has U233 bombs in their arsenal because if you want to
kill people on a mass scale Uranium-235 and Plutonium-239 are far more
practical than Uranium-233.

*A Thorium reactor only produces about 1% as much radioactive waste as a
conventional reactor, and the stuff it does make is not as nasty, after
about 5 years 87% of it would be safe and the remaining 13% in 300 years; a
conventional reactor would take 100,000 years.

*A LFTR Thorium reactor has an inherent safety feature, the fuel is in
liquid form (Thorium dissolved in un-corrosive molten Fluoride salts) so if
for whatever reason things get too hot the liquid expands and so the fuel
gets less dense and the reaction slows down.

*There is yet another fail safe device. At the bottom of the reactor is
something called a "freeze plug", fans blow on it to freeze it solid, if
things get too hot the plug melts and the liquid drains out into a holding
tank and the reaction stops; also, if all electronic controls die due to a
loss of electrical power the fans will stop the plug will melt and the
reaction will stop.

*Thorium reactors work at much higher temperatures than conventional
reactors so you have better energy efficiency; in fact they are so hot the
waste heat could be used to desalinate sea water or generate hydrogen fuel
from water.

* Although the liquid Fluoride salt is very hot it is not under pressure so
that makes the plumbing of the thing much easier, and even if you did get a
leak it would not be the utter disaster it would be in a conventional
reactor; that's also why the containment building in common light water
reactors need to be so much larger than the reactor itself and why the
walls of it needs to be so thick. With Thorium nothing is under pressure
and there is no danger of a disastrous phase change, like ultra hot
pressurized water turning into steam, so the super expensive containment
building can be made much more compact.

John K Clark

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0nR-TNwxkhXka650WSY0oXmasQarqNbzEGE-g2BfHJ2Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to