I am not going to pass judgment on this. I can't really do that. I can only 
say that this is a minority report. The general consensus I am hearing is 
that a compound that changes the pH of blood in a way that slows the 
progress of a protistan responsible for malaria has no influence on a 
corona virus.

LC

On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 3:02:12 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:

> Refute this Telmo- 
> https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study
>
> https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext
>
> One viewer here indicated this was not a study-but it is a study indeed 
> concluding the benefits of Hydro. 
>
> Now what do I think? If it works it works, and if it doesn't it doesn't. 
> Do the opponents of the old drug in question care if it works? Seemingly 
> no, they are just foaming at the mouth because Orange Dude endorsed it. If 
> it doesn't work, screw it. If it can help some people, keep it at hand. 
> What does John Clark care about? Orange Man Bad!  This has zero to do with 
> fighting the Wuhan flu. For the opponents of Orange Man nothing else 
> matters. Civil (US) Conflict? Next stop! Take care.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Telmo Menezes <[email protected]>
> To: John Clark <[email protected]>; 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
> [email protected]>
> Sent: Thu, Jul 30, 2020 2:28 pm
> Subject: Re: Sharpiegate
>
>
>
> Am Do, 30. Jul 2020, um 17:16, schrieb John Clark:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:27 AM Telmo Menezes <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>
>
> > *I disapprove of Trump and everything he stands for as much as you do. 
> I detest him. He is an incompetent narcissist, and his election as the 
> president of the USA was a nightmare come true.*
>
>
> Truer words were never spoken! 
>
> > *I think that the current extreme political polarization of all things 
> is doing damage to science. A symptom of this is that the epistemological 
> status of things such as the efficacy of hydroxychloriquine became 
> impossible to determine for those not deeply involved in the field, even if 
> scientifically literate and able to follow the papers.*
>
>
> Crackpots, and in that I would include Trump supporters and the
> hydroxychloroquine cure COVID-19 people, don't just dispute well 
> established theories, they dispute the raw data itself. I've had otherwise 
> intelligent people tell me that every epidemiologist in the world is wrong, 
> and the entire scientific community is wrong, and even insist every bit of 
> data we have about COVID-19 is wrong. Why would they do that? Because if 
> the data was right they would have to radically change their worldview and 
> face the fact that Donald Trump is not doing a good job. Changing one's 
> worldview is quite painful for some people.
>
> Nobody can be knowledgeable about everything, so if the vast majority of 
> expert 
> specialists in the world on a very complicated subject like epidemiology, 
> agrees on something, people who have spent their life studying the subject, 
> then I think they are much more likely to be correct then you or I are 
> after we've only been studying the matter for 20 minutes or so. That's why 
> people read scientific journals and believe that what they say is probably 
> true even if they haven't personally carried out the experiments described 
> in them. People that we trust, because they have proven to be right in the 
> past, judge new research and if they think it's not valid they don't 
> publish it in their journals, and if they think it is valid then they do. 
> It's a web of trust, it's what the cryptographic program PGP uses to 
> ensure that a public key really belongs to the person that it claims to. 
> And history has shown the system, although not perfect, works pretty well 
> most of the time, which is a hell of a lot better than most things work.
>
> And by the way, I don't think Trump has spent even 20 minutes studying 
> viral epidemiology or statistical theory in his entire life. 
>
>
> I more or less agree with everything you say. That is exactly why I worry 
> that incidents such as the Lancet retraction are damaging to the web of 
> trust. 
>
>
> Telmo
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/777296fb-a76b-4b8a-aef6-f8bb70c45aa4%40www.fastmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/777296fb-a76b-4b8a-aef6-f8bb70c45aa4%40www.fastmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>  
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4cbd46d5-96e5-49d8-b662-6e9b4c493e92n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to