On Thursday, July 30, 2020 at 10:52:09 PM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
> > > On 7/30/2020 1:02 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: > > Refute this Telmo- > https://www.henryford.com/news/2020/07/hydro-treatment-study > > https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)30534-8/fulltext > > One viewer here indicated this was not a study-but it is a study indeed > concluding the benefits of Hydro. > > Now what do I think? If it works it works, and if it doesn't it doesn't. > > > That's just false. Some things work on some infections in some people > using some protocols of care. > Agreed. Ongoing large scale international clinical trials are what they are. Nobody claims that they or the papers in their wake are perfect, but to pretend that a few tiny studies are "in need of refutation" or that the world's epidemiological community is orchestrating conspiracies without evidence like some on Twitter and on social media tend to peddle, is naive or evidence of the effectivity of disinformation, *not evidence of effectivity of medication*. But if Telmo and/or Mitch need, they can always get in touch with their closest epidemiologists/docs and ask for the data and emails, and inform the coordinating committee of their findings and worries, citing who they wish. While data of the majority of ongoing trials and appropriate epidemiological discourse may not be accessible on the net or published ("ongoing" being somewhat relevant...), it isn't classified or anything. PGC -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7b0f1042-5393-4803-a0ed-0267dce99170n%40googlegroups.com.
