> On 21 Sep 2020, at 22:48, Philip Thrift <cloudver...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Monday, September 21, 2020 at 12:49:22 PM UTC-5 Brent wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/21/2020 4:44 AM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> 
>> Some Remarks on the Logic of Quantum Gravity
>> Andreas Doering
>> 
>> https://www.academia.edu/5456772/Some_Remarks_on_the_Logic_of_Quantum_Gravity
>>  
>> <https://www.academia.edu/5456772/Some_Remarks_on_the_Logic_of_Quantum_Gravity>
>> 
>> We discuss some conceptual issues that any approach to quantum gravity has 
>> to confront. In particular, it is argued that one has to find a theory that 
>> can be interpreted in a realist manner, because theories with an 
>> instrumentalist interpretation are problematic for several well-known 
>> reasons. Since the Hilbert space formalism almost inevitably forces an 
>> instrumentalist interpretation on us, we suggest that a theory of quantum 
>> gravity should not be based on the Hilbert space formalism. We briefly 
>> sketch the topos approach, which makes use of the internal logic of a topos 
>> associated with a quantum system and comes with a natural (neo-)realist 
>> interpretation. Finally, we make some remarks on the relation between system 
>> logic and metalogic.
>> 
>> ...
>> 
>> Finally, when we commit ourselves to describing the whole universe using 
>> structures in a topos, and if we use the internal logic of the topos to 
>> assign truth values to propositions etc., we do not have to do all our 
>> proofs and mathematical arguments internally in the topos, i.e., 
>> constructively. Doing physics necessarily means to separate oneself from the 
>> system to be described, even if this system is the whole universe.
> 
> Where does that "necessarily" come from?  Is it a theorem?...from what 
> axioms? 
> 
>> Since we have to ‘step out’ of the system, we have to argue using the 
>> (typically Boolean) metalogic in which we define the mathematical 
>> structures, e.g. topoi and state objects, that we use in the mathematical 
>> description of the system at hand. It is this Boolean metalogic in which we 
>> do physics.
> 
> Smells like Platonism.
> 
> Brent
> 
> 
> 
> Topos (Category) language is an alternative language for physics.


Topos is typically not a language. Indeed it is a mathematical structure which 
associates to itself its own language. Language is derivative in topos or other 
rich categories. A language name expression becomes itself an arrow, a “natural 
object” of some kind, in a category.

Bruno


>  
> 
> There is no God that handed down the language physics must adopt.
> 
> But it is  a language closer to programming:
> 
>      https://github.com/AlgebraicJulia/Catlab.jl
> 
> 
> 
> Review of the Topos Approach to Quantum Theory
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/51913885_Review_of_the_Topos_Approach_to_Quantum_Theory
> 
> Topos theory has been suggested as an alternative mathematical structure with 
> which to formulate physical theories. In particular, the topos approach 
> suggests a radical new way of thinking about what a theory of physics is and 
> what its conceptual framework looks like. The motivation of using topos 
> theory to express quantum theory lies in the desire to overcome certain 
> interpretational problems inherent in the standard formulation of the theory. 
> In particular, the topos reformulation of quantum theory overcomes the 
> instrumentalist/Copenhagen interpretation thereby rendering the theory more 
> realist. In the process one ends up with a multivalued/intuitionistic logic 
> rather than a Boolean logic. In this article we shall review some of these 
> developments. 
> 
> 
> @philipthift
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7e589031-e8ed-4062-b080-cc6830a06d0bn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7e589031-e8ed-4062-b080-cc6830a06d0bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/034ED9FE-8B4E-437E-97C2-AF71D075702A%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to