On Monday, September 28, 2020 at 7:07:40 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:

>
>
> On Monday, September 28, 2020 at 1:30:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/28/2020 9:22 AM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> The GOP is interested in rushing this through so Don-the-Con t'Rump has a 
>> 6 to 3 "voting block" on SCOTUS. A point of concern are state legislatures 
>> overruling the popular vote and appointing Trump electors or simply 
>> throwing out results. This could well happen in red states that turn blue. 
>> There could then be states not returning electors or with state 
>> legislatures that may appoint GOP electors. This would then go to the 
>> SCOTUS 
>>
>>
>> Would it?  The Constitution provides that if no candidate gets a majority 
>> of the electoral votes, then the House will elect the President from among 
>> the top three receiving electoral votes.  In this election each state gets 
>> one vote...so Repugs would carry the vote.  Similarly, the Senate selects a 
>> Vice President.  
>>
>> I don't see SCOTUS having any part in this and given their make up they 
>> certainly will have no motive to intervene.
>>
>> Brent
>>
>
> The drop-dead date for the EC to vote (it never actually meets) is Dec 14, 
> not Jan 2 when the new congress convenes. The D's would likely prefer the 
> NEW House to vote for President, even though their electoral victory on Nov 
> 3 might not be sufficient to defeat Trump). But my point is that the D's 
> will likely object to the Dec 14 date, and since it's in FEDERAL statutory 
> law (the first Monday after the second Tuesday in Dec), it will surely 
> involve the USSC. In response to LC, the original flaw is not in the 
> American people, but in the flawed document called the Constitution. Our 
> Founders didn't trust "the People", so they invented the EC to prevent a 
> popular vote. Soon we will likely be paying the consequences of this flaw. 
> AG
>

My point about whether SCOTUS gets involved, is I could imagine they either 
try to run out the clock or state legislatures invalidate electors. The 
Constitutionality of that could go before SCOTUS.

LC
 

>
>> and t'Rump has a near guarantee of a rubber stamp approval. This is a big 
>> reason for this rush. The GOP leaders, including McConnell, know t'Rump is 
>> at 40-43% with Biden 55% or so. This is a huge gap, and only with various 
>> shenanigans can they get around this. 
>>
>> If this happens and it sticks I will no longer believe in this country. I 
>> will certainly no longer believe in the government and it will be clear the 
>> Constitution is shredding material. Even more though I will no longer 
>> believe in the American people, where I think for decades there has been a 
>> celebration of ignorance, superstition and honoring of brutes. Think of the 
>> Rambo films. We will be witnessing the passing of the American Republic, 
>> which is as momentous to our age as was the end of the Roman Republic.
>>
>> LC
>>
>> On Saturday, September 26, 2020 at 5:05:38 PM UTC-5 [email protected] 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The new US supreme court nominee will be Amy Coney Barrett, and she is 
>>> just the sort of person you would expect, a religious crockpot. She is a 
>>> member of an extreme right wing Catholic cult called "The People of 
>>> Praise"; they speak in tongues, believe in biblical prophecy, and in divine 
>>> healing. Members of the cult swear a lifetime oath of allegiance to one 
>>> another and are assigned a ideology coach called a “head” for men and a 
>>> “HANDMAID” for women to make sure nobody strays from the official dogma. 
>>> The "heads" and "handmaids" issue orders on who to date, who to marry, 
>>> where to live, whether to take a job, whether to buy a home, and how to 
>>> raise children. Part of the ideology of People of Praise is that husbands 
>>> should give orders to their wives and only men should have authority over 
>>> the family. 
>>>
>>> During her confirmation hearing in 2017 to be a federal judge Barrett 
>>> said  "*I take my faith seriously and I’m a faithful Catholic*". In 
>>> 2013 she said: "*I tend to agree with those who say that a Justice’s 
>>> duty is to the Constitution and that it is thus more legitimate for her to 
>>> enforce her best understanding of the Constitution rather than a precedent 
>>> she thinks clearly in conflict with it*"; and as a judge she approved a 
>>> Indiana law banning abortions of a deformed fetus (although her opinion was 
>>> later overturned by a higher court and the Indiana law ruled 
>>> unconstitutional). So when she is approved Roe v. Wade Will be as dead as a 
>>> doornail and we're back to the 1950's and coathanger abortions. Barrett 
>>> also criticized Chief Justice Roberts for his opinion that saved Obama’s 
>>> Affordable Care Act; so in the middle of a global pandemic the health 
>>> care coverage of tens of millions of people will be as dead as a doornail 
>>> too when she hears her first case on October 10. 
>>>
>>> To those who claim Barrett's religious views will not effect her legal 
>>> opinions I will remind you that in 2006 she said  “*If you can keep in 
>>> mind that your fundamental purpose in life is not to be a lawyer, but to 
>>> know, love and serve God, you truly will be a different kind of lawyer.*” 
>>> Amy Coney Barret would also be the youngest justice on the bench, so she 
>>> could be around for many decades.
>>>
>>> John K Clark
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Everything List" group.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>>
>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2ca66211-46fd-4e7f-be0d-90f9e5aea3aan%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/2ca66211-46fd-4e7f-be0d-90f9e5aea3aan%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4c9d8969-8d2c-4f17-9cc6-a64620eb9207n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to