On 10/24/2020 3:02 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
On Saturday, October 24, 2020 at 3:16:31 PM UTC-5 Brent wrote: On 10/24/2020 5:29 AM, Jason Resch wrote:It's using the Planck scale as the upper bound.So what? That's assuming the Planck scale means something, but it's already rejected as 'unatural'. You can't have it both ways. BrentThe Planck length is the scale at which the Compton wavelength of a particle is equal to the circumference of a black hole. It is not hard to calculate. This is then the smallest scale at which information can be accessed. It is the smallest region where a qubit can be isolated. With the accelerated expansion of the universe there are vacuum modes passing across the cosmic horizon. However, at the same time transPlanckian modes are stretched across this scale. It is also nature's way of providing a natural renormalization cut-off scale.
But the context was calculation of the vacuum energy density. Absent even a theory of quantum gravity I see no reason to take seriously the idea that the vacuum energy density consists of the ground state energy of the various quantum fields, much less that there is some "fine tuned" cancelation of the fermion and boson components.
Brent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f171fe41-05a1-1eff-7274-2845600bec11%40verizon.net.
