On Friday, October 30, 2020 at 2:43:13 AM UTC+1 [email protected] wrote:

> Orange dude is funding so much stuff now, that from a research point of 
> view he is flooding pharma and especially academia with research grant$. 
>

What- with his 750$ tax payment?
 

> On the other hand, treating scientists who politicize their own work is 
> something I personally hate. My contention is, that it doesn't matter of 
> one is a cutting edge physicist, but if their politics corrupts their 
> research, they need to spotlighted. I have seen this in action with climate 
> scientists, many of whom have claimed that there is too late to do 
> anything, and I tell you I have read this. These climatologists appear to 
> me to want governmental control, of which they become a part of, to 
> dominate the rest of us-in order to save the "earth." 
>

Yes, they are a kind of new jew, but instead of money they make it about 
the earth and living free from "toxins". 
 

>
> What is my fix for climate? Glad you asked. 
>

I didn't so it cheese again + why should there even be a fix when nothing 
is broke and you just implied yourself that saving the "earth" is just a 
scam?
 

> I would go bigtime via solar, (if possible) windpower at sea (if possible) 
> and safer uranium and thorium fission (if possible), and also if the MIT 
> SPARC or Lattice fusion, or Heirich Hora's lasers, or-anything that works 
> well, 
>

Cheese and your patented "anything that works well" approach again. You 
know you'll win prizes for this, right? Why not approach some scientists 
outside of this list and tell us of your heroic tales and deeds?
 

> and provides the abundance that humanity needs. Politicized scientists 
> often lead to gene/race fanatics, or Lysenko, or Mao's Great Leap Forward 
> 1958-60, which killed 45 million Han. The birds insects crop thing. 
>
> "Ok genius, what about abortion!" I'd change abortion practices to this 
> (if possible) -
>
> https://www.tue.nl/en/research/research-groups/cardiovascular-biomechanics/artificial-womb/
>

And then force the baby to live with mothers of children from rape 
scenarios or to live with children they cannot support/afford to live with, 
because god wanted it like that. I'm sure your internet research will 
contribute to the fruition of that technology.
 

>
> Covid? Looks like we might be more successful with treatment of covid in 
> live patients then a vaccine, but that is just my guess. 
>

As we can see via the abrupt end of people dying from the disease. Nobody 
is dying. It's all fake news. Just go check your local hospital.
 

>
> Those who choose politics over science have some other game in mind as in 
> the statement from former mayor of Chicago and Obama's chief spokesman Rahm 
> Emanuel: "Never let a good crisis go to waste." Meaning screw fixes, lets 
> milk this.
>

For example, if the liberal science guys say they are concerned with 
"social distance" to limit transmission paths and break infection chains, 
it's obvious that they only want to stop us from rallying indoors with our 
supreme leader. Those eggheads want to stop us from partying with their 
"science". Totally milking this. Yeah thank goodness of Jesus Christ the 
savior, for the fact that decent people like republicans, yours truly, and 
yourself... we'd never do that.  PGC

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/129a428c-d462-43ce-b284-cfd6bbeae304n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to