On Friday, January 8, 2021 at 7:19:35 AM UTC-7 [email protected] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 9:32 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: > > *> This is why you seem to "argue" like a Trumper (even though you're >> not). You asked me to define "THIS world" and I gave you a straight forward >> answer, which inexplicably you can't seem to understand.* >> > > It's perfectly OK to use the word "this" In everyday conversation, but > what we were discussing is if the idea that "THIS world" Is always > splitting many trillions of times a second is valid or not. In that context > the meaning of the phrase "THIS world" is far from obvious. > > >> > It's the world where anyone one of us can witness physicists measuring >> a quantum event, >> > > Any *ONE*? If Many Worlds is correct then an astronomical number of Alan > Graysons remember witnessing a physicist measure a quantum event, but the > Alan Graysons will not all have the same memories. > Let's say AG goes into a lab and does repeated quantum spin measurements along some axis. THIS AG will have memories of ALL his observations and he's NEVER observed being split. Moreover, if we accept the MWI, those OTHER worlds and OTHER AG's, will be disjoint from each other, and will have the memory of only ONE observation. AG > John K Clark See my new list at Extropolis > <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/31ab6746-fae6-4a15-8115-6115ac5cff0fn%40googlegroups.com.
