On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 5:01:43 AM UTC-7 Lawrence Crowell wrote:
> On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 1:52:50 PM UTC-6 [email protected] > wrote: > >> Which measurement do you consider as representing the physical reality? >> And what is the role of fluctuations in the BB? TIA, AG >> > > Both, remember in a quantum and/or logic the Schrodinger cat is both alive > and dead! > LC > IMO, as expressed repeatedly on another thread, I think this conclusion is rooted in an erroneous interpretation of the double slit experiment. The particle, localized in space, goes through ONE slit, but the deBroglie wave associated with the particle goes through BOTH slits and interferes with itself, to produce the interference pattern. Unfortunately, this is erroneously interpreted as the particle going through BOTH slits simultaneously. Schrodinger created a thought experiment to demonstrate the fallacy, but the lesson wasn't learned. AG > > >> On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 12:17:13 PM UTC-7 Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >>> If you measure the continuum of spacetime with an optical system that >>> has a long baseline or low energy you will get complete smooth flatness, If >>> you probe spacetime with extremely high energy in a Heisenberg microscope >>> setting you will get wild tumble of fluctuations and foam. >>> >>> LC >>> >>> On Wednesday, February 17, 2021 at 3:33:23 AM UTC-6 [email protected] >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> https://www.sciencealert.com/a-new-measurement-of-quantum-space-time-has-found-nothing-going-on >>>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c8ccb9f8-ce7f-44d8-a15f-ce157ac78312n%40googlegroups.com.
