> On 5 Jul 2021, at 11:41, Tomas Pales <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Monday, July 5, 2021 at 4:25:09 AM UTC+2 Brent wrote:
> But there's no random selection involved unless you make it a postulate.  
> Otherwise it's just a collection.
> 
> There is obviously a selection because I don't see all possible outcomes, 
> just one.
>   And if there's a selection (by nature) then why not a selection of one that 
> is realized?
> 
> What is the difference between "realized" and "unrealized"? If I don't grace 
> something with my presence and perception it doesn't mean that it is 
> "unrealized".
> 

Absolutely. Brent was using a sort of propensity interpretation of CI, it makes 
disappearing the branches which we cannot access, but that leads to a form of 
cosmosolipism directly incompatible with Mechanism. It adds some magic, for 
eventually the wish of a unicity?

Bruno 



> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4c76bef4-fbc5-4c2e-83ab-9d32160b71den%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4c76bef4-fbc5-4c2e-83ab-9d32160b71den%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/C0C8BE29-4FD1-45A5-B7C8-3F63C99C4E39%40ulb.ac.be.

Reply via email to