On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, 10:15 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:50 AM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, 9:39 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:29 AM Jason Resch <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021, 4:07 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 7/6/2021 10:34 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 12:27 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And you're never going to find a being that behaves intelligently
>>>>>> based on information that can be quantum erased.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You need only a quantum computer with enough qubits.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you prove that?  How does this quantum intelligence ever arrive at
>>>>> a definite decision?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Prove? No. But I think I can justify it:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Quantum computers are Turing equivalent, they can compute anything a
>>>> classical computer can.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Human brains are believed to operate according to physical laws, all
>>>> known of which are computable.
>>>>
>>>> 3. Humans are conscious.
>>>>
>>>> 4. By any of: Chalmers's principle of "Organizational invariance", or
>>>> "multiple realizability", or the "Generalized Anti-Zombie Principle", or
>>>> the "computational theory of mind", a functionally equivalent computation
>>>> to that of a conscious human brain will be equivalently conscious to that
>>>> brain.
>>>>
>>>> 5. Quantum computers are reversible.
>>>>
>>>> By 1 & 2, a quantum computer can simulate a human brain. By 3 & 4, such
>>>> an emulation will be conscious. By 5 any computation performed by a quantum
>>>> computer can be quantum erased by reversing the circuit back to its
>>>> starting state.
>>>>
>>>> It reaches a definite decision by virtue of completing its processing
>>>> before ultimately being reversed. This prevents an outside observer from
>>>> learning the decision, but it's made nonetheless during the course of the
>>>> processing.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How do you know that it has reached a definite decision? Without having
>>> it print out some irreversible record? If it prints out a
>>> (pseudo-)classical record, the initial state is not recoverable.
>>>
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>
>> By either:
>>
>> 1. Analyzing the circuit
>> 2. Having the circuit do something useful and verifiable (as in my
>> factoring example)
>> 3. Having the circuit output that it did observe a definite value but
>> without reporting which value it observed (as in Deutsch's original example)
>>
>
>
> All of these involve decoherence.
>

#1. Is just looking at the program and verifying if the quantum computer
runs it, it will reach a particular state in the course of it's operation,
in the same way we might looks at the experimental setup of a quantum
eraser setup and conclude when the photon is in this position in the
apparatus that it will be in a particular state, even if that state is
ultimately erased from our view later.

You have to show that you can decohere part of your QC without decohering
> the rest. I wish you luck!
>

#2. This is done by Shor's algorithm, which erases parts of the computation
so other parts can successfully interfere to give the desired answer.
Shor's algorithm has been implemented and run.

#3. Would be another example of #2, reversing (and erasing) a prior
measurement of a qubit put in a superposition after storing a bit
indication that the qubit was a 0 or 1 (but not saying which). I believe
Deutsch describes this experiment in his seminal paper that defined the
universal quantum computer in 1985.

Jason



> Bruce
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Everything List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQizo0ubknrt%2Bjk9grjmCoaMMQ8DScwE9KcS%2BmHVoszaQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQizo0ubknrt%2Bjk9grjmCoaMMQ8DScwE9KcS%2BmHVoszaQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CA%2BBCJUih%2B56zCGiyxB9NkYE1a3ELdc07PSzeQYX__OeBV76tsg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to