> On 10 Jul 2021, at 21:41, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 7/10/2021 1:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> So, in general we can conclude by generalizing this to any large number of >> particles that even with what we consider to be permanent records, you don't >> get rid of the theoretical possibility of interference between the sectors >> where those records are different.
I did not write this, and out of context, I don’t know if I agree or not with this. > > We can if the universe is expanding faster than light beyond the Hubble > radius. How do you a physical being to singularise its consciousness? The term “physical universe” is no more an ontological being if we assume Digital Mechanism. It is an appearance, a phenomenological reality, not an ontology. Bruno > > Brent > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4aae1572-2765-e262-8936-a4d6e3c842e3%40verizon.net. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/79018753-C701-4CC7-ABA7-6D134F48C6BA%40ulb.ac.be.
