On 7/12/2021 2:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Jul 2021, at 21:41, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/10/2021 1:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
So, in general we can conclude by generalizing this to any large number of
particles that even with what we consider to be permanent records, you don't
get rid of the theoretical possibility of interference between the sectors
where those records are different.
I did not write this, and out of context, I don’t know if I agree or not with
this.
We can if the universe is expanding faster than light beyond the Hubble radius.
How do you a physical being to singularise its consciousness?
The term “physical universe” is no more an ontological being if we assume
Digital Mechanism. It is an appearance, a phenomenological reality, not an
ontology.
The Hubble radius isn't a "physical universe", it's a 2-surface.
Brent
Bruno
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4aae1572-2765-e262-8936-a4d6e3c842e3%40verizon.net.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e565c355-32a5-9ff4-45c1-77d626d29449%40verizon.net.
