Just say you will use the knowledge you possess to make life better. Nobody else on the mailing list can really claim this, now can they LC?The Paganism statement reminds me of the Jewish Physics by Phillipe Lenard & Johannes Stark. Or a bit closer to the aryan theory espoused by Ousepensky and the Thule Society of Bavaria. Militant transgenderism is one thing, but if somebody kicks our knowledge a notch higher, whomever they are, I ain't going to spit in there faces, that is for sure! The light switch works or it don't? Meaning whatever it predicts must work Bohr's interpretation is mild compared to what has been done by Everett, DeWitt & Wheeler. Although this view is Split (bwah hah hah etc...yawn)
-----Original Message----- From: Lawrence Crowell <goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> To: Everything List <everything-list@googlegroups.com> Sent: Thu, Oct 28, 2021 7:01 pm Subject: Re: FW: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry? I truly hope nobody is taking any of this seriously. LC On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 9:11:06 AM UTC-5 medinuclear wrote: From: Philip Benjamin Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:11 AMgeneral...@googlegroups.comSubject: RE: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry? [Philip Benjamin]. WAMP-the-Ingrate (from KG to the University) is more concerned with transgenderism, XX = XY and the perversely fraudulent data of the entomologist Kinsey than with dark-matter sciences. It is conceivable that a freshman science student in a foreign university can NOW accomplish more than the WAMP (Western Acade-Media Pagan(ism)—the stealing beneficiaries of the Augustinian Trust. Worldviews are just that—NOT SCIENCE. It was a colossal blunder for that brilliant Bohr to bring in his world view through the backdoor as science. Many a pagan scientist in the West with un-awakend consciousness do that. They at the same time find fault with ecclesiastical establishment for defending Geocentricism, without any THINKING of the fact that it was the “science” of those days (for all recorded history) including that of the brilliant astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy. However, the calculations resulted in the same results, be it geo or helio centric. That is not what Bohr did—in hisCopenPagan Misinterpretation! An AS IF behavior needs only an AS IF logic. Not one Puritan scientist ( Michel Faraday was perhaps the last) resorted to the Bohr misfeasance. Philip Benjamin . -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0ddf5458-4970-45ce-9770-14b3e093a706n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/611782950.1372235.1635470416305%40mail.yahoo.com.
