Ben frames foggy headed ideas of physics with religious nonsense. It is just pure rubbish is all. I also am not a partisan of any quantum interpretation either. I see these as unprovable or indemonstrable hypotheses about quantum physics.
LC On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 8:20:21 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote: > Just say you will use the knowledge you possess to make life better. > Nobody else on the mailing list can really claim this, now can they LC? > The Paganism statement reminds me of the Jewish Physics by Phillipe Lenard > & Johannes Stark. Or a bit closer to the aryan theory espoused by > Ousepensky and the Thule Society of Bavaria. Militant transgenderism is one > thing, but if somebody kicks our knowledge a notch higher, whomever they > are, I ain't going to spit in there faces, that is for sure! The light > switch works or it don't? Meaning whatever it predicts must work > > Bohr's interpretation is mild compared to what has been done by Everett, > DeWitt & Wheeler. Although this view is Split (bwah hah hah etc...yawn) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lawrence Crowell <[email protected]> > To: Everything List <[email protected]> > Sent: Thu, Oct 28, 2021 7:01 pm > Subject: Re: FW: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] FW: Dark Matter: How > Physics Overlooks Chemistry? > > I truly hope nobody is taking any of this seriously. > > LC > > On Thursday, October 28, 2021 at 9:11:06 AM UTC-5 medinuclear wrote: > > > > *From:* Philip Benjamin Wednesday, October 27, 2021 9:11 AM > [email protected] *Subject:* RE: FW: FW: [Consciousness-Online] > FW: Dark Matter: How Physics Overlooks Chemistry? > > [*Philip Benjamin*]. > WAMP-the-Ingrate (from KG to the University) is more concerned > with transgenderism, XX = XY and the perversely fraudulent data of the > entomologist Kinsey than with dark-matter sciences. It is conceivable that > a freshman science student in a foreign university can NOW accomplish more > than the WAMP (Western Acade-Media Pagan(ism)—the stealing beneficiaries of > the Augustinian Trust. > Worldviews are just that—NOT SCIENCE. It was a colossal blunder for > that brilliant Bohr to bring in his world view through the backdoor as > science. Many a pagan scientist in the West with un-awakend consciousness > do that. They at the same time find fault with ecclesiastical establishment > for defending Geocentricism, without any THINKING of the fact that it was > the “science” of those days (for all recorded history) including that of > the brilliant astronomer and mathematician Ptolemy. However, the > calculations resulted in the same results, be it geo or helio centric. That > is not what Bohr did—in his *CopenPagan* Misinterpretation! An AS IF > behavior needs only an AS IF logic. Not one Puritan scientist ( Michel > Faraday was perhaps the last) resorted to the Bohr misfeasance. > *Philip Benjamin* . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0ddf5458-4970-45ce-9770-14b3e093a706n%40googlegroups.com > > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/0ddf5458-4970-45ce-9770-14b3e093a706n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a78f26ac-1234-4b4a-babc-3a9f7b7a49dcn%40googlegroups.com.
