[image: cartoon, vote for less tax.jpg] On Sunday, July 17, 2022 at 6:10:04 PM UTC-5 [email protected] wrote:
> The extremely rich, who bribe the pols, JC, see higher taxes as merely, > The Cost of Doing Business. Higher taxes don't make anything more virtuous. > The only virtuousness lays with who in fact benefits???? I would say that > if somebody who makes a miracle medicine (not just a bullshit claim) is > better than say George S's Tides Foundation which funds for Dem district > attorneys that view lifelong street criminals to be freed, because they > endured hard lives as children, and then they end up killing their victims. > This looks to be the crime rise perception feeder. > > Meaning what? Meaning a policy is only good If and Only If, it really > helps? Thus, I'd go for measuring results of public policy, yeah, with > statistics as a starter. > > The wealth of the uber rich matters to me only how their lobbying to > politicians benefits us or harms us?? My take on this is, globalism=bad, > crime=bad, no drilling=bad 4 now, no mass solar installations = bad, bad, > bad. no battery storage =bad. > > Your view might be, no national medical service = inhuman! > Mine might be =Ok, what's a good way of generating wealth to pay for this? > > On Bush Junior, I have heard and maybe this is simply disinformation, > that 43 enabled Bin Laden to escape to Iran (wink wink) and deliberately > looked the other way to please his families Saudi friends. IF TRUE, and I > don't know if it is, then the dude is criminal, and it only proves the > vileness of allowing ourselves to be ruled by the rich. Meaning I am kind > of a wannabe bourgeoise-power guy. Ok well, that going to go nowhere, but, > just saying. > > On women's autonomy over their bodies? I believe especially for attractive > women, that neither the women themselves, nor, any politician from anywhere > should have autonomy over their bodies. I think that I should have autonomy > over their bodies. Yes, that's it! They, for some reason, disagree. > > On abortion, I believe based on research biologists using sheep, that we > are at the point where fetal transfer into incubation boxes, aka artificial > wombs, aka a womb with a view, are at hand, So instead of abortions we do > that, and yes, pay for it, as a social workaround. $$$. > > > https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/artificial-wombs-how-sci-fi-could-one-day-meet-the-nicu > > > https://www.iflscience.com/this-artificial-womb-and-ai-nanny-is-the-future-of-child-development-claim-chinese-scientists-62437 > > > https://www.wionews.com/science/synthetic-wombs-elon-musk-other-tech-entrepreneurs-discuss-population-collapse-solutions-446496 > > Yes to rapidly funding and prototyping. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Clark <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Sent: Sun, Jul 17, 2022 6:06 pm > Subject: Re: Do you have a right to travel? Republicans say no. > > On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 5:10 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > > *> The last question first (3) I am a conservative in the sense of being a > nationalist because it seems to work better than the globalism, and the > rule of corporations which bribe politicians with campaign donations.* > > > And apparently you believe the best way to reduce the amount of bribery > the super ultra mega rich heads of corporations engage in is to oppose any > attempt by the Democrats to increase the taxes on those very same super > ultra mega rich corporate heads. That does not compute. > > > > > * me no trust da billionaires,* > > > So you want to protect those billionaires that you don't trust from the > Democrats who want to tax them more so they become only ultra mega rich > and not super ultra mega rich. Explain that to me because I don't quite > follow your logic. > > > > > Buchanan once wanted Bush the Elder not to do Desert Storm because, > "Iraq is just like North Korea!" > > > It turned out the Elder Bush was right about the Kuwait War but his son > was wrong about the Iraq War, dead wrong. > > > *> Yes, I am opposed to the Holy Rollers restricting travel for any > reason. * > > > I'm glad to hear it, now I must ask if you think people should have > autonomy over their own bodies or should politicians in Washington have > the final say about that? > > John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis > <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> > qps > > > > > > I hope you're right but I don't think you are. 2024 is too far in the > future to make political predictions that are worth a damn, but I think the > Democrats are gonna lose control of both the House and the Senate in the > midterm election this year, the Antidemocrats are going to triumph. > Unemployment is the lowest it's been in years and the dollar is the > strongest it's been in a generation, but gas prices are high and even > though neither the president nor the Congress has much influence over that > they are the ones in power so they are the ones who are going to get blamed. > > And to many people, and to all Republicans, knocking a dollar off the > price of a gallon of gas is more important than the US Constitution, and > more important than the right to travel and the right to have autonomy over > your own body, in particular the right to control your own womb if you have > one, and more important than the right to put any chemical you wish into > your body to relieve chronic excruciating unrelenting white hot pain if you > are dying. And Republicans believe low gas prices are more important than > the most important right of all, the right to die if you wish to die. > > I have to admit Biden is not totally blameless for the current high rate > of inflation, on the very first day of his presidency he should've > eliminated by Executive Order all the Trump era tariffs, which are paid for > by Americans not by foreign countries, but for some reason that makes no > economic sense some of them are still in place. > > > *> It will generate reverse-action against Bible Belt governors, > attorneys, politicians. * > > > If only it were that simple and that logical! Roy Moore, a Bible thumping > judge in Alabama, the heart of the Bible Belt, came within a hair's breadth > of becoming a US Senator even though convincing evidence was available that > he was a pedophile. This happened for two reasons: > > 1) On the ballot he had a "R" next to his name not a "D". > 2) He may have been a pedophile but he was a Bible thumping pedophile, and > that makes all the difference. > > > I will close by asking you 3 questions. > > 1) Mr. Spudboy, do you think you should have the right to travel? > > 2) Being "conservative" means you wanna keep on doing things the way > they've always been done, so I understand why conservatives oppose the > Democrats when they try to increase taxes on the super ultra mega rich and > why conservatives want to keep them very low as they've always been, but > what is "conservative" about radically changing the way we've handled > abortions for the last half century? > > 3) What exactly are conservatives trying to conserve? > > > > ngc > > h > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/3b4fe705-c1ab-4f77-8c43-aa07a825415dn%40googlegroups.com.
