On Tuesday, July 19, 2022 at 7:55:31 AM UTC-7 medinuclear wrote:

> [*Philip Benjamin*]
>
>      Climatology is not only a pseudoscience (unlike meteorology), it is 
> also part of the fanatic pagan religion of WAMP-the-Ingrate. I have written 
> to some “authors” promoting this myth of CO2 as a global danger (completely 
> ignoring the greater danger of oxygen depletion of (2 atoms of O-16  for 
> each atom of C-12 introduced). Of course those “blasphemous” notes are 
> never even acknowledged.
>
Oxygen is orders of magnitude more abundant than carbon and constitutes 21% 
of the gas in the atmosphere.  Even if we burned all the oil and gas and 
coal we would only reduce oxygen levels by 2 to 3%, not enough pose any 
risk.  The increase in CO2 is the problem.  Why do you call something that 
is based on sound theory and has made highly accurate predictions over at 
least 50 years "pseudoscience"? 

>     This whole notion of “fossil” fuel is unsettled, yet. How many 
> dinosaurs and other species will be need to produce thes massive deposits 
> of petroleum? An abiotic origin is mandatory. The earth has enough 
> carbonaceous matter, nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen, fire. Steam, sulfur, 
> phosphorus etc. plus enormous pressure and heat to keep on producing 
> petroleum (without any bio mass).
>
Fossil fuels have zero dinosaurs, they formed about 300 million years ago 
and are constituted mainly of plants, bacteria and algae.  Abiogenesis is 
not a well supported theory. 

>      If the earth survived at least 5000 years and 383 trillion tons of 
> CO2, it will continue after the paltry ~ 5.1 trillion tons of CO2 for 50 
> past years and100 future years of petroleum burning, thanks primarily to 
> Carbon Cycle, as I have always stated. Moreover, the glaciers in the water 
> will noi raise the sea level after melting, it will only reduce the level 
> !!  Furthermore, only about 30% of the earth surface is land mass.
>
Brent has previously answered the first part of your statement.  How do 
melting glaciers REDUCE the sea level???   What is the relevance of the 
fact that 30% of the Earth's surface is land mass? 

>  
>
  https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/8349/cold-and-snow. The climatic 
*snow 
> line *is about 15,000 ft above sea level at the equator. It is 
> progressively lower as the latitude increases, to just below 9,800 ft in 
> the Alps. The melting of mountain ice alone cannot dangerously raise the 
> sea level; for that very powerful forces (not by CO2 !!) will be required 
> to bring up the humongous subterranean water beds.
>
 Glacial ice, Antarctic ice, Greenland ice etc. etc. I don't expect you to 
read this but I post it nonetheless.  
https://nsidc.org/cryosphere/glaciers/quickfacts.html

>      Destroy the petroleum industries, then even the battery industry will 
> be destroyed because some of the 6000 byproducts of petroleum are entail 
> for battery production also. This only infuriates WAMP-the-Ingrate. They 
> have no sense of humor, logic or rationality, or fairness. A bundle of 
> madness !
>
Nobody says we should dump petroleum overnight.  We can gradually wean 
ourselves.  In theory all these chemicals can be manufactured from carbon 
and hydrogen, but we will obviously still need fossil fuels to extract more 
complex molecules.

Dirk

> *Philip Benjamin*
>
>          
>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/7da95e61-34a6-4fae-8a30-52f757109097n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to