Am Mo, 1. Aug 2022, um 12:14, schrieb John Clark:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 4:12 PM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> >> So bitcoin can avoid problems if they can just find somebody that 
>>> >> everybody agrees is a saint. But you could say the same thing about the 
>>> >> US dollar if everybody agreed that the Chairman of the Federal Reserve 
>>> >> is a saint. 
>> 
>> *> You don't need a saint. That's the genius of the protocol design, a 
>> trusted system without any trusted individuals. You just need no majority of 
>> the nodes to be working against the system.*
> 
> Bitcoin is between a rock and a hard place. If the number of miners is 
> reduced the energy efficiency increases but the security declines because it 
> allows the elite to spend one of their Bitcoins and keep it too. If the 
> number of miners is increased the security gets better but the energy 
> required to complete an economic transaction increases. If you use Bitcoin or 
> anything like it and you want honesty then you're going to have to expend a 
> ridiculous amount of energy every time you buy a candy bar.

This is not how it works. Each mining attempt also tries to fulfill the 
outstanding transactions in the network -- or at least the ones that pay what 
the miner considers to be an acceptable fee. Each block contains many 
transactions.

Telmo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/6c80a0d6-6b45-48d6-9b84-ca946accd50b%40www.fastmail.com.

Reply via email to