Nobody said the solar storm had anything to do with climate change. As for 
the wild fires it is the case they are adding to the 55 billion tons of CO2 
entered into the atmosphere by fossil fuels. 

You follow what I notice of Christians. Jesus said to give up wealth to the 
poor. However, Christians most often align with the most wealthy and 
powerful. You are a religious shill for the oil companies. Remember that 
little bit in Matthew where Jesus said though you professed my name etc, 
when the kingdom comes I will not know you. It is the same with all 
Christian Churches, they all align with fascistic power. All but one 
Christian Church aligned with Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, which was the 
Jehovah's Witnesses. Most Christians are just dirty fascists, and if Jesus 
does exists (which I strongly doubt) he will probably say "I don't know 
you."

LC

On Thursday, August 18, 2022 at 9:42:34 AM UTC-5 medinuclear wrote:

> *What Threshold Threat of CO2 from Climate Change?*
>
> https://news.yahoo.com/solar-storm-strike-earth-direct-101857176.html “Solar 
> storm about to strike Earth in a direct hit” Adam Smith Mon, July 18, 2022 
> at 5:18 AM Solar effects (sunspots, solar storms etc.) etc. will certainly 
> affect the wind systems of the globe. That has nothing to do with CO2 
> quantities!! The pseudoscience of climatology (not meteorology) which is 
> now an integral part of a worldwide pagan religion, contrary to the  
> Augustinian ‘awakened’ consciousness.  (
> https://www.midwestaugustinians.org/conversion-of-st-augustine, 
> https://www.history.com/topics/british-history/great-awakening).     
>
>     An estimated 1,050 wildfires worldwide produced global CO2 emissions 
> of 76 billion tons in 2021. That is on the average ~ 3 forest  fires each 
> day, producing ~ 78 billion tons of CO2/day. The petroleum burning per year 
> is 5.1/ 150 =  ~  1/30 = ~ 0.03 trillion tons of CO2 = 3 x 10^-2 x10^12 = ~ 
> 30 billion tons of CO2/year. Which is a threat?   What is the threshold of 
> CO2 doom?
>
>         https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/8349/cold-and-snow. The 
> climatic *snow line *is about 15,000 ft above sea level at the equator 
> and 19,000 ft in the Himalayas. It is progressively lower as the latitude 
> increases, to just below 9,800 ft in the Alps. The reduced volume of 
> melting of *glaciers & icebergs (about 90% below the water surface) can 
> only lower the sea level.  The melting of* mountain ice alone cannot 
> dangerously raise the sea level; for those very powerful forces (not by CO2 
> !!) will be required to bring up the humongous subterranean water beds. 
>
>        Destroy the petroleum industries, then even the battery industry 
> will be destroyed because some of the 6000 byproducts of petroleum are 
> indispensable 
> for battery production also. Industries cannot keep an oil refinery open 
> just for batteries! Automobile battery alone may then cost prohibitively 
> high.      
>
> Philip Benjamin
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/e29f92c4-2d09-4de0-b6fe-2274aafb2c85n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to