On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 9:32 AM John Clark <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 6:14 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> *> That is as much mumbo-jumbo as anything in Copenhagen. For instance,
>> what determines if the difference between the worlds is small 'enough'?*
>
>
> If only a tiny change has been made then it's not unlikely that another
> tiny change can change it back, but the more changes that occur the less
> likely it is that will happen. It's rather like thermodynamics, if you
> watch a movie of just 2 pool balls colliding you can't tell if the movie is
> running forwards or backwards, but if you watch a movie of a pool ball
> hitting 10 pool balls arranged in a geometrical pattern then it's easy to
> tell if the movie is running forwards or backwards. The more changes there
> are between the 2 universes the less likely it is for them to merge back
> together again, and the changes multiply very rapidly, that's why
> performing these sorts of quantum experiments are difficult.
>
>> *> You are using the result of no divergence between worlds to conclude
>> something about a divergence that probably never occurred. It is simpler to
>> state that no measurement was made in the Deutsch set-up. Measurement,
>> after all, involves irreversible decoherence, and such cannot be 'quantum
>> erased'. So no which-way measurement would have been made in the Deutsch
>> experiment.*
>
>
> If no which-way measurement has been made then how do you explain the
> document that swears that such a measurement HAD been made?
>


No such document can exist since no measurement was made. Or, if such a
document exists, it is fraudulent. Quantum erasure experiments do not prove
MWI.

Bruce

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLSJDEfWcOyR1w%3Dc%2BUkFysb_5Vdkw4y-FaMOQgfP08df%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to