On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 7:37 PM Bruce Kellett <[email protected]> wrote:
*> In all cases, if the which-way information is preserved, no interference > is seen. * True. *> But if the which-way information is quantum erased, interference is > visible. * Also true .... but then… why would you say "*I, too, would expect to see interference bands*" if Deutsch's experiment was actually performed? *> How this works in the delayed choice set-up has been explained by Sabine > Hossenfelder.* I stopped reading Hossenfelder sometime ago when she started defending Superdeterminism; yes it can explain all the weirdness in the quantum world but it requires, quite literally, the greatest violation of Occam's razor that is possible in order to do so. I would even go so far as to say Superdeterminism requires an *INFINITE *violation of Occam's razor, and that is not a word I use very often. For that reason I don't see how any rational person could take Superdeterminism seriously. John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis> org tof -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAJPayv0V6Ow9ePd5Jd3Y5R68bx5Eh72VhtBqXnnYPngB0B3HdA%40mail.gmail.com.
