On 11/21/2022 4:38 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:35 AM Brent Meeker <meekerbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 11/21/2022 4:33 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
    On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:08 AM Brent Meeker
    <meekerbr...@gmail.com> wrote:

        He's wrong that frequentism does not empirically support
        probability statements.  He goes off on a tangent by
        referring to "other gamblers".  Nothing in physics is
        certain, yet Deutsch takes a bunch of definite assertions and
        claims they alone are the real physics.


    His critique of frequentism is just a recap of arguments that are
    well known -- you cannot ground probability theory in
    frequentism, or the idea that probabilities are nothing more than
    ratios of long-run frequencies. Long-run frequencies might
    approximate the probabilities, but they cannot be used to ground
    probability theory -- for well known reasons. I agree that he
    goes off on a number of irrelevant tangents, and he is wrong to
    suppose that frequentism is a main-stream theory of
    probability (at least, these days).

    But frequencies are how we test probabilistic theories.


Testing is not a theoretical grounding of the theory.

It's not the axiomatic ground of Kolmogorov's theory.  But so what? We tested Euclid's theory of geometry by making measurements which weren't in his axioms.  That doesn't mean Euclid's wasn't a good theory of geometry.  I can see Deutsch crossing off Pythagora's theorem saying, "No matter how precise our instruments they only yield rational quantities!"  Physics is not mathematics and it's never going to have data to infinitely many decimal places.  That frequencies only yield rational number approximations to Born rule predictions doesn't seem like a big deal to me.

Brent


Bruce
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTNVrzp0JRzjwLU_2qb6nosugcSoGYuhtt%3D3Edq9dLOFQ%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLTNVrzp0JRzjwLU_2qb6nosugcSoGYuhtt%3D3Edq9dLOFQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/b85d2b9a-662a-2cf7-862c-e86420c7c85c%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to