On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 9:29 AM John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 5:14 PM Bruce Kellett <bhkellet...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> *> Given a long series of N spin measurements, MWI says that there is
>> always one person who sees N spin-ups. Since this observation is certain,
>> it has probability one. Whereas the Born probability of seeing N ups is
>> 1/2^N. A clear contradiction.*
>  The probability that Bruce Kellett will see N spin-ups is indeed one.
> However the probability that you will see  N spin-ups is not. As I
> mentioned before, for this sort of discussion the way the English language
> handles personal pronouns needs to be modified.

It is not a question of whether you will see the N spin-ups, or whether it
is just one copy of Bruce Kellett that will see this. The incompatibility
arises from the fact that the series of N spin-ups necessarily exits in
MWI, where it only has probability 1/2^N from the Born rule.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 

Reply via email to