Brain doesn't exist. "Brain" is just an idea in consciousness. On Thursday 11 July 2024 at 22:04:14 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote:
> Only in the most idealized sense of Turing completeness would we argue > whether the brain is Turing complete. Neural networks are Turing complete. > > If we're interested in whether consciousness requires Turing completeness, > it seems silly to use the brain as a *counter example* of Turing > completeness only because it happens to be a finite, physical object with > noise/errors in the system. For all practical purposes, whatever properties > one would confer to a Turing complete system, the brain has them. > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 2:43 PM Jason Resch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I agree Turing completeness is not required for consciousness. The human >> brain (given it's limited and faulty memory) wouldn't even meet the >> definition of being Turing complete. >> >> Jason >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/790395f7-2797-41d7-9d62-9f366a6051e7n%40googlegroups.com.
