On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 12:35:38 PM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:

First of all, you talk about space as if it is some obvious concept. But is 
not obvious at all. As a quale in consciousness, space is a particular 
meaning that ended up in our consciousness for evolutionary reasons: this 
quale helped us survive and reproduce. Is identical to the quale of "sexy 
woman". That sexiness that you feel when you look at a woman, is a quale in 
your consciousness designed to facilitate reproduction. Space is identical 
to sexiness: is a quale designed to facilitate survival and reproduction. 
Yes, it feels as if it has nothing to do with such matters, it feels as if 
it is some pre-existing stage in which consciousnesses only later appeared 
and only based on this pre-existing stage did they partake in the processes 
of survival and reproduction. But this feel is misleading. The quale of 
space itself is involved in survival and reproduction directly. Given this 
true nature of what space actually is, your questions become simple 
nonsense, random mumbling, no different that the angels on a needle. Do you 
understand now how deep the rabbit hole goes ?

And also as I bonus, sometimes when I'm tired and I sit in bed at night, I 
experience 4D space. How that 4D feels like is as if I'm seeing an object 
both all-around and inside. So where does that 4D space reside if not 
solely in my consciousness ?


* Good bye and good luck. This is my last response to you. AG*


On Thursday 3 October 2024 at 20:25:14 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

On Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 11:19:20 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:

The very words that you use have no meaning. So how can any conversation be 
had ? Is like wanting to debate how many angels fit on the head of a 
needle. Sure, it has the appearance of a well formulated question, but it 
is actually meaningless.

 
 You're entitled to your opinions, but I'm seeking substantive responses, 
so please refrain from posting on this thread. AG 


On Thursday 3 October 202 Thursday, October 3, 2024 at 9:50:12 AM UTC-6 
Cosmin Visan wrote:

You can only ever observe yourself. So by unobservable you mean the minds 
of other consciousnesses ?


I'm seeking substantive responses, so please refrain from posting on this 
thread. AG 


On Thursday 3 October 2024 at 17:21:28 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:

To recapitulate and clarify the argument:

Firstly, by "universe" (our "bubble"), I mean the observable *and* 
unobservable regions defining our expanding universe.
 
Secondly, since our universe is expanding, we could run the clock backward 
to any earlier time, and imagine enclosing it in a sphere, say, 
establishing that the observable region is finite in spatial extent. (It's 
actually measured to have a radius of 46 BLY.)

Thirdly, concerning the *un*observable region, let's assume it's infinite 
in spatial extent. If so, this couldn't have occurred in stages, say by 
spatial expansion, since no matter how fast it might expand, or for how 
long a length of time, it would remain finite throughout, and could never 
achieve infinite status. Hence, the only way it could be infinite in 
spatial extent, would be for it to be either *UN*-*created*, or if it had a 
beginning it must have expanded *instantaneously* to infinity in spatial 
extent. These options are falsified in two ways; first by the CMBR, which 
is predicted by the Big Bang. That is, empirical evidence affirms it had a 
starting time. And second, as previously argued, if it is now infinite in 
spatial extent and had a beginning, it would have had to expand 
*instantaneously* to infinity. Since I consider this physically impossible 
-- which is my unproven and likely unprovable assumption -- by two lines of 
argument our universe must be finite in spatial extent.
 
Final conclusions:, being *finite* in spatial extent, *it cannot be flat* 
(despite the consensus view), since that implies infinite in spatial extent 
(assuming it's not toroidal). And there is no need to do any measurements. 
Using a purely logical argument, our universe is finite in spatial extent 
and cannot have a flat global geometry. Its likely global geometry is 
approximately spherical, since it's expanding in all directions from every 
point in spacetime and is approximately isotropic. What could be *uncreated 
and infinite in space and time*, is the substratum from which our universe 
emerged.
 
QED, AG

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/f6a290ab-1fc2-47cd-bd76-a582b8736baen%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to