On Fri, Oct 4, 2024 at 9:21 AM PGC <[email protected]> wrote:

> When a quantum system interacts with an environment the combined system
> develops into an entangled state where system and environment become
> entangled through their interaction, resulting in the superposition of
> correlated states. This does not require the environment to physically
> duplicate. This naturally emerges from the unitary evolution governed by
> the Schrödinger equation.
>

It does require environment duplication if you want the different outcomes
to each entangle separately.

The “branching” into multiple outcomes is a way to conceptualize the
> resulting entangled superposition, with each “branch” corresponding to a
> different outcome, with the system and environment in correlated states.
>
> Also, I thought the tensor product is bilinear (linear in each of its
> arguments). So for quantum states, the following would be a standard
> operation:
>
> (∣a⟩+∣b⟩)⊗∣e⟩=∣a⟩⊗∣e⟩+∣b⟩⊗∣e⟩
>
> The distributive law applies due to properties of tensor products. Yes, we
> have nonlinear functions but linear operators. There’s potential for
> confusion here, as the Hamiltonian includes terms that are nonlinear
> functions of position and momentum.
>

But does the distributive law apply to quantum states? We can represent the
situation as a tensor product, but a tensor product of what? The things we
write down may not be physical reality.

Bruce

Iirc these functions are however constructed from linear operators and,
> when properly defined, result in linear operators themselves. Linearity for
> me refers to the way operators act on quantum states within a Hilbert
> space. Obviously this is essential for the superposition principle. I’m a
> tourist here, but nonlinear operators seem exotic. Linearity of QM is
> essential for consistency of the theory/accurate predictions.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQYOFyivg3gioJF-ZbGuvP%3DK6SyW3uUieYO5ctSQmqNow%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to