@Quentin. So why do you think that the wokies want to exterminate the normal white men ?
On Wednesday 23 October 2024 at 10:10:25 UTC+3 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > @Cosmin you're the typical troll... I know it's a disservice to answer > your post as it will incentive you to continue to do so, but could you > please end your selfish game or play it elsewhere. Also this message > doesn't exists Alan deleted it 🤔🤣 so you can't answer it *it's fool proof* > > Le mer. 23 oct. 2024, 09:03, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < > [email protected]> a écrit : > >> @Quentin&all. You make the classical confusion between ontology and >> epistemology. >> >> On Wednesday 23 October 2024 at 09:57:43 UTC+3 Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Le mer. 23 oct. 2024, 08:43, 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < >>> [email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>>> @Jesse, yes, it is a rational argument that you never touched a woman. >>>> How do you expect to know how women are if you never touched one ? >>> >>> >>> Women don't exist, you're speaking from your fantasy not from reality. 🤔 >>> >>> >>> >>> > You're speaking from your fantasy, not from reality. >>> >>>> >>>> On Wednesday 23 October 2024 at 00:31:09 UTC+3 Terren Suydam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Jesse, that was about as perfect of a reply to anyone as I've seen in >>>>> a long time. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 3:11 PM Jesse Mazer <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Undermining your own point a bit by responding to criticism with >>>>>> emotional lashing-out as opposed to reasoned argument >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 2:27 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> @Jesse. Probably you are still living in your parents basement and >>>>>>> never touched a woman if you say that men are not more logical than >>>>>>> women. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 at 21:15:43 UTC+3 Jesse Mazer wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What is the connection between female hero stories and genocide of >>>>>>>> men? Would you analogously say that having more stories of non-white >>>>>>>> male >>>>>>>> heroes can only be due to wokies who want to genocide white people, or >>>>>>>> do >>>>>>>> you think there is something fundamentally different about the former? >>>>>>>> Either way I don't see any consistent pattern of female hero stories >>>>>>>> being >>>>>>>> rejected by the public, it seems to me to mostly depend on the quality >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> the writing (or gaming or action depending on genre). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Biology does mean women are statistically less physically strong >>>>>>>> and less prone to certain kinds of aggression, but in the animal >>>>>>>> kingdom we >>>>>>>> do see plenty of female violence even if not as associated with mating >>>>>>>> contests as it is with males (for example females of predator species >>>>>>>> sometimes do more hunting than males as with lions, many female >>>>>>>> animals >>>>>>>> engage in plenty of territorial violence against others of their >>>>>>>> species, >>>>>>>> and in one of our closest relatives the Bonobos, females form >>>>>>>> coalitions to >>>>>>>> fight back against males who might otherwise use their greater >>>>>>>> strength to >>>>>>>> dominate females: https://archive.ph/GEv46 ). My rule of thumb is >>>>>>>> that only those claimed differences between men and women that would >>>>>>>> make >>>>>>>> just as much sense when applied to other animals are plausibly >>>>>>>> strongly >>>>>>>> influenced by biology, those that would seem implausible if applied to >>>>>>>> say >>>>>>>> lions or bonobos (like the claim that men are more decisive or more >>>>>>>> logical >>>>>>>> than women) are more likely a result of culture, unless there is good >>>>>>>> evidence that goes beyond just observations of statistical differences >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> behavior in the modern world. Good article here on the sex differences >>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>> tend to be seen in other primates: >>>>>>>> https://sites.pitt.edu/~bertsch/Lonsdorf-2016-Journal_of_Neuroscience_Research.pdf >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:31 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything List < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @Jesse. The woke regime only increased its power in the last >>>>>>>>> couple of years. I don't know if it will continue, I cannot predict >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> future. Maybe it will loose the war on the games and movies front and >>>>>>>>> they >>>>>>>>> it will slowly go away. Or maybe in spite of companies getting >>>>>>>>> bankrupt, it >>>>>>>>> will keep getting funded no matter the financial cost and then it >>>>>>>>> will just >>>>>>>>> go straight to extermination as the last measure to make sure they >>>>>>>>> win the >>>>>>>>> war. It remains to be seen what the outcome will be. One thing is >>>>>>>>> clear, >>>>>>>>> despite the regressive speech of PGC, people don't want woke. If they >>>>>>>>> would >>>>>>>>> have wanted, games and movies would have thrived. Instead, they keep >>>>>>>>> failing. The "female hero story" is not just "another cultural >>>>>>>>> thing", but >>>>>>>>> it goes against biology. If you go against biology you only create >>>>>>>>> repulsion in people. Sure, some desperate incels and simps will agree >>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>> anything in the hope that they will finally lose their virginity at >>>>>>>>> 40 >>>>>>>>> years old. But for normal people, "strong and independent woman" just >>>>>>>>> creates a sense of disgust and repulsion because it goes against >>>>>>>>> biology. >>>>>>>>> As the saying goes: You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the >>>>>>>>> effects of ignoring reality. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 at 20:18:13 UTC+3 Jesse Mazer wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Who do you think are the prominent players in "the woke regime"? >>>>>>>>>> Do you think Obama and Biden were *not* part of the woke regime, and >>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>> they are, what's your explanation for why they didn't try to >>>>>>>>>> exterminate >>>>>>>>>> their political enemies? If they're not part of it, do you think >>>>>>>>>> Kamala >>>>>>>>>> Harris is any more likely to be, and if so why? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 1:03 PM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything >>>>>>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @PGC. "By invoking extreme language like "exterminate," the >>>>>>>>>>> original poster distorts reality" >>>>>>>>>>> So you never opened a history book in your life to see how >>>>>>>>>>> totalitarian regimes exterminated millions of people ? Do you think >>>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>>> when the woke regime will take the power you will be spared ? You >>>>>>>>>>> are right >>>>>>>>>>> there in their list. Together with Alan Grayson and other white >>>>>>>>>>> knights >>>>>>>>>>> that believe they will get cookie points for being good dogies for >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> regime. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 at 18:56:01 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 22, 2024 at 8:53:12 AM UTC-6 PGC wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Before proceeding with an informal analysis of "Why do the >>>>>>>>>>>> wokies want to exterminate the normal white men ? Their parents >>>>>>>>>>>> neglected >>>>>>>>>>>> them when they were kids ? Where does their hatred towards >>>>>>>>>>>> humanity come >>>>>>>>>>>> from ?", I want to preface this response by clarifying that by >>>>>>>>>>>> appearing to >>>>>>>>>>>> reply to the original post, *I am not engaging in what I >>>>>>>>>>>> believe to be a good faith discussion*. The original poster's >>>>>>>>>>>> intentions are unclear when resorting to discursive strategies >>>>>>>>>>>> like the one >>>>>>>>>>>> I just cited. Their motivations could stem from a variety of >>>>>>>>>>>> factors: a cry >>>>>>>>>>>> for help, escapist behavior, a lack of validation, lack of >>>>>>>>>>>> education, lack >>>>>>>>>>>> of exposure to rigorous arguments, or other unfortunate >>>>>>>>>>>> circumstances. >>>>>>>>>>>> Rather than engage in a debate about the specifics of the >>>>>>>>>>>> statement, which >>>>>>>>>>>> I have no interest in, I will instead offer a bit of analysis to >>>>>>>>>>>> explain >>>>>>>>>>>> why such an attempt may be fruitless. This is not merely a >>>>>>>>>>>> response to an >>>>>>>>>>>> isolated comment but a reflection on a broader issue in online >>>>>>>>>>>> discourse, >>>>>>>>>>>> of which the cited statement is merely one example. I believe this >>>>>>>>>>>> dynamic >>>>>>>>>>>> is worth bringing to the list's attention, as it represents a >>>>>>>>>>>> significant >>>>>>>>>>>> problem in how discussions unfold online. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The statement, "Why do the wokies want to exterminate the >>>>>>>>>>>> normal white men? Their parents neglected them when they were >>>>>>>>>>>> kids? Where >>>>>>>>>>>> does their hatred towards humanity come from?" is emblematic of >>>>>>>>>>>> reactionary >>>>>>>>>>>> rhetoric that simplifies complex issues and creates a false binary >>>>>>>>>>>> between >>>>>>>>>>>> victimized "normal white men" and the so-called "wokies." This >>>>>>>>>>>> phrasing >>>>>>>>>>>> dehumanizes (inconsistent for someone who keeps mentioning "the >>>>>>>>>>>> god in >>>>>>>>>>>> everyone") and mischaracterizes those who advocate for progressive >>>>>>>>>>>> causes, >>>>>>>>>>>> while amplifying an exaggerated sense of victimhood for the >>>>>>>>>>>> speaker's own >>>>>>>>>>>> demographic. By invoking extreme language like "exterminate," the >>>>>>>>>>>> original >>>>>>>>>>>> poster distorts reality, casting themselves as a target of >>>>>>>>>>>> nonexistent >>>>>>>>>>>> aggression because the streaming they consume, does not align with >>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>> "values". Deep stuff that feeds the original poster's research, >>>>>>>>>>>> one is >>>>>>>>>>>> inclined to guess. Such tactics are designed to stoke fear and >>>>>>>>>>>> deflect >>>>>>>>>>>> attention from more substantive, nuanced discussions about race, >>>>>>>>>>>> gender, >>>>>>>>>>>> social justice, and theories of everything. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, the insinuation that progressives suffer from >>>>>>>>>>>> childhood neglect ("Their parents neglected them when they were >>>>>>>>>>>> kids?") >>>>>>>>>>>> introduces an ad hominem attack that serves no purpose other than >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> invalidate the proponents of these causes. This rhetorical move >>>>>>>>>>>> deflects >>>>>>>>>>>> from any genuine engagement with the issues at hand and instead >>>>>>>>>>>> reduces the >>>>>>>>>>>> debate to personal insult, a common technique in bad-faith >>>>>>>>>>>> argumentation. >>>>>>>>>>>> The emotional charge of this statement, combined with its lack of >>>>>>>>>>>> intellectual substance, makes it clear that this is not an >>>>>>>>>>>> invitation to >>>>>>>>>>>> dialogue but rather an attempt to provoke and polarize. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The original poster’s framing of this issue also reflects a >>>>>>>>>>>> broader phenomenon in modern discourse, where progressive >>>>>>>>>>>> movements are >>>>>>>>>>>> demonized as harboring a deep-seated "hatred towards humanity." >>>>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>> reflects an inversion of reality, where efforts to expand rights >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> address inequality are recast as hostile, destructive forces. In >>>>>>>>>>>> this way, >>>>>>>>>>>> the speaker avoids confronting the merits of progressive arguments >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> instead presents a distorted caricature, which provides a shield >>>>>>>>>>>> against >>>>>>>>>>>> critical engagement. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The original poster's belief that media (such as "The Acolyte" >>>>>>>>>>>> or Marvel) is part of a woke conspiracy to undermine traditional >>>>>>>>>>>> values >>>>>>>>>>>> further illustrates a paranoid response to cultural change. The >>>>>>>>>>>> presence of >>>>>>>>>>>> female heroes is not evidence of a conspiracy, but rather part of >>>>>>>>>>>> a broader >>>>>>>>>>>> and overdue shift towards diversity in storytelling. This paranoia >>>>>>>>>>>> reflects >>>>>>>>>>>> a discomfort with modern cultural dynamics and a desire to retreat >>>>>>>>>>>> to an >>>>>>>>>>>> imagined past where certain identities and roles were dominant. In >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>> way, the statement serves to entrench a worldview that resists >>>>>>>>>>>> change and >>>>>>>>>>>> views any challenge to established norms as part of a sinister >>>>>>>>>>>> agenda. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Furthermore, the original poster's *view of academia as >>>>>>>>>>>> indoctrinated churches* while simultaneously attempting to >>>>>>>>>>>> publish unverified research without citations highlights a >>>>>>>>>>>> profound >>>>>>>>>>>> cognitive dissonance. This reflects a common pattern in >>>>>>>>>>>> anti-intellectual >>>>>>>>>>>> populist rhetoric: a desire to gain recognition from academic >>>>>>>>>>>> institutions >>>>>>>>>>>> while rejecting their methods and standards. The speaker's disdain >>>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> citations—seeing them as unnecessary for someone who believes they >>>>>>>>>>>> hold >>>>>>>>>>>> original insights—indicates a *lack of engagement with >>>>>>>>>>>> intellectual rigor*. This is particularly telling given that >>>>>>>>>>>> many of the ideas they hold may in fact originate from others, and >>>>>>>>>>>> their >>>>>>>>>>>> refusal to cite these sources points to both intellectual >>>>>>>>>>>> dishonesty and >>>>>>>>>>>> insecurity. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The original poster's *immaterialist beliefs*, viewed as >>>>>>>>>>>> literally proven fact rather than as one metaphysical framework >>>>>>>>>>>> among many, >>>>>>>>>>>> reflect the rigid, absolutist thinking typical of ideologues. By >>>>>>>>>>>> treating >>>>>>>>>>>> metaphysical assumptions as incontrovertible, the speaker avoids >>>>>>>>>>>> engaging >>>>>>>>>>>> with the diversity of thought in philosophy and science, >>>>>>>>>>>> preferring to >>>>>>>>>>>> present their ideas as beyond reproach. This kind of *epistemic >>>>>>>>>>>> closure*—where one’s worldview is sealed off from >>>>>>>>>>>> criticism—makes productive discourse nearly impossible, as any >>>>>>>>>>>> challenge is >>>>>>>>>>>> dismissed as ignorance or error. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The tendency to *insult dissenters as sexually frustrated >>>>>>>>>>>> virgins* adds another layer of psychological projection. This >>>>>>>>>>>> ad hominem attack aims to belittle opponents by reducing their >>>>>>>>>>>> intellectual >>>>>>>>>>>> positions to personal failings, specifically around sexuality, >>>>>>>>>>>> which the >>>>>>>>>>>> speaker likely views as a central axis of human worth!? This >>>>>>>>>>>> insult betrays >>>>>>>>>>>> a *deep-seated insecurity*, where the speaker’s own identity >>>>>>>>>>>> is bolstered by denigrating the supposed sexual inadequacies of >>>>>>>>>>>> others. >>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a form of argumentation that sidesteps real discussion and >>>>>>>>>>>> instead >>>>>>>>>>>> turns to *personal degradation* as a distracting attack >>>>>>>>>>>> mechanism. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In examining this pattern of discourse, it is important to >>>>>>>>>>>> *recognize >>>>>>>>>>>> that the continual engagement with such bad-faith statements often >>>>>>>>>>>> leads >>>>>>>>>>>> nowhere*. The poster’s reliance on goalpost-shifting—changing >>>>>>>>>>>> the terms of the debate when confronted with criticism—*is a >>>>>>>>>>>> known tactic designed to exhaust interlocutors and avoid genuine >>>>>>>>>>>> resolution*. >>>>>>>>>>>> Well-meaning individuals who attempt to reason with the original >>>>>>>>>>>> poster >>>>>>>>>>>> often fall into this trap, giving the poster more opportunities to >>>>>>>>>>>> provoke >>>>>>>>>>>> further with each response. This cycle underscores the difficulty >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> addressing misinformation and ideological manipulation in online >>>>>>>>>>>> spaces, >>>>>>>>>>>> where time is scarce, and the production of misinformation is both >>>>>>>>>>>> quick >>>>>>>>>>>> and easy. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In conclusion, the aim of this analysis is not to engage with >>>>>>>>>>>> the original statement as if it were a genuine attempt at >>>>>>>>>>>> dialogue, nor to >>>>>>>>>>>> legitimize the assumptions embedded in it. Rather, it is to >>>>>>>>>>>> illustrate a >>>>>>>>>>>> broader issue with online discourse, where misinformation, >>>>>>>>>>>> distortion, and >>>>>>>>>>>> bad-faith arguments proliferate. The time required to unpack >>>>>>>>>>>> flawed >>>>>>>>>>>> assumptions and correct biases is far greater than the time it >>>>>>>>>>>> takes to >>>>>>>>>>>> produce these provocations. *Even this analysis, in its >>>>>>>>>>>> attempt to dissect the issue, risks legitimizing the original >>>>>>>>>>>> poster’s >>>>>>>>>>>> intent simply by acknowledging it*. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Instead, I encourage people to be cautious in how we engage >>>>>>>>>>>> with such statements and recognize when the effort to respond is >>>>>>>>>>>> counterproductive. The science of misinformation is still young, >>>>>>>>>>>> and while >>>>>>>>>>>> there are no easy solutions, it is crucial to remain aware of the >>>>>>>>>>>> dynamics >>>>>>>>>>>> at play. Loaded questions and provocations are easy to produce, >>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>> contextualizing and correcting them is cumbersome—a reality that >>>>>>>>>>>> highlights >>>>>>>>>>>> the challenges of meaningful discourse in the digital age. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hopefully, as more people are exposed to rigorous, >>>>>>>>>>>> evidence-based discussions, they will become more adept at >>>>>>>>>>>> identifying >>>>>>>>>>>> these tactics and will focus on fostering genuine dialogue rather >>>>>>>>>>>> than >>>>>>>>>>>> being drawn into fruitless exchanges. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This imbalance creates the known dilemma for anyone attempting >>>>>>>>>>>> to engage with bad-faith arguments. It's also an oversight in >>>>>>>>>>>> education, >>>>>>>>>>>> that nowadays overemphasizes competence acquisition over critical >>>>>>>>>>>> thought >>>>>>>>>>>> (as this is hard to measure and the testing industry relies on >>>>>>>>>>>> quantitative >>>>>>>>>>>> results because economic ideology with performance orientation >>>>>>>>>>>> dominates >>>>>>>>>>>> developing critical thought ability) as the many fruitless online >>>>>>>>>>>> discussions that everybody has experienced can indicate: it is a >>>>>>>>>>>> non-trivial problem as "do not feed the troll" can also be abused >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>> marginalize speakers etc. as well. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Predictably, the type of approach of the original poster will >>>>>>>>>>>> continue to flood the list with similar statements and continue to >>>>>>>>>>>> misdirect attention with provocations etc. I will neither reply to >>>>>>>>>>>> bad >>>>>>>>>>>> faith replies of the original poster, nor will I concern myself >>>>>>>>>>>> with them >>>>>>>>>>>> for more than a few seconds. But I can console the original >>>>>>>>>>>> poster: I do >>>>>>>>>>>> want my 30 minutes back, and in this sense, the original poster is >>>>>>>>>>>> "victorious". He managed to make me regret this waste of time. >>>>>>>>>>>> Apologies >>>>>>>>>>>> for having perhaps wasted any reader's time in so doing but I do >>>>>>>>>>>> believe >>>>>>>>>>>> that the problem of misinformation in the online world is >>>>>>>>>>>> larger/deeper >>>>>>>>>>>> than we give it credit. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Excellently written and exactly correct on the substance. >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you, AG* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 22, 2024 at 2:49:32 PM UTC+2 Cosmin Visan >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> You want to exterminate the normal white men ? They were the >>>>>>>>>>>> oppressors and you were the oppressed and now you want to take >>>>>>>>>>>> revenge in >>>>>>>>>>>> the classical marxist style ? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 22 October 2024 at 15:03:34 UTC+3 John Clark wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 4:03 AM 'Cosmin Visan' via Everything >>>>>>>>>>>> List <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *> Why do the wokies want to exterminate the normal white men ?* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Normal white men don't exist. * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *> Their parents neglected them* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Parents don't exist. * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> * > when they were kids ? * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Kids don't exist. * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *> Where does their hatred towards humanity come from ?* >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *Humanity doesn't exist. But unfortunately you do seem to >>>>>>>>>>>> exist. * >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> *John K Clark See what's on my new list at Extropolis >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/g/extropolis>* >>>>>>>>>>>> ude >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/959af6d9-8767-4d14-b539-a2c41d167d75n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/959af6d9-8767-4d14-b539-a2c41d167d75n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a50901c6-e98d-4d98-9718-b5ca960fd719n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/a50901c6-e98d-4d98-9718-b5ca960fd719n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4475dfcf-969b-4dd7-96c0-c3b077f93028n%40googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/4475dfcf-969b-4dd7-96c0-c3b077f93028n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>>> . >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>> send an email to [email protected]. >>>>>> >>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAPCWU3L3DCJRU%3DfTP9HeYRO8eCiqbvmV5PE%3DUMb_kzdpNWj3jg%40mail.gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAPCWU3L3DCJRU%3DfTP9HeYRO8eCiqbvmV5PE%3DUMb_kzdpNWj3jg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "Everything List" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/685ac346-28f2-4684-b576-b17119d2502en%40googlegroups.com >>>> >>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/685ac346-28f2-4684-b576-b17119d2502en%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>>> . >>>> >>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Everything List" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> > To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ee6e1790-2fc7-4eeb-91c5-49a151b2a00dn%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/ee6e1790-2fc7-4eeb-91c5-49a151b2a00dn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/62798fd7-1272-4dec-9246-3b1510701e2en%40googlegroups.com.
